Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative paper at affordable prices!

Introduction

The topic of this lecture strikes one as puzzling because it has an air of familiarity and yet it seems to startle one into trying to figure out what poetry is. Then one wonders what poetry has to do in the lives of individuals and society. It is quite easy to relate poetry to poems but what makes poems cardinal to existence seems unclear. Does it transform or enrich individuals and communities? How is this done?

As one ponders these questions, some commonly held ideas, derived from impressions of poetry the study of prescribed poems in schools begin to come to the fore. One recalls how "poems canonized by scholars" were thrust on students and how they were expected to respond enthusiastically to these classic in the poetic tradition of Literature. But alas, one could neither muster nor feign the required feeling of excitement; most of the poems seemed to parade verbal puzzles that proved quite formidable. How could such writings as obtrusively affronted one's senses be responsible for indicating a worthwhile life style?

If poetry presents one with this high measure of unease, then how desirable would a poetic life be? Is poetry not a collection of pieces of writing that are notorious for the uneconomic use of space on pages of paper? Are the uneven lines on paper, not a result of dislocations of normal linguistic patterns? Is the stock of trade of poetry not the distortion of conventions word, phrase, clause and sentence order? Do poetic manipulation of sounds, images and meanings ever facilitate communication? Is poetry not a recondite method of transmitting experience? If one is unable to grasp the poetic import and is successfully denied involvement in the transmitted experience, how can he benefit from the supposed bounty provided by poetry? These questions not only suggest the reader's notion of the formidability of poetry, they underscore his frustration.

Order Custom Essay on Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative

The reader's frustration stems form the manner in which the "outer form" of poems places obstacles on the reader's attempt to gain entry into the secret bowers of poetry. The situation is worsened by the fact that teachers of poetry openly declare that the daunting linguistic paraphernalia constitutes the hallmark of real poetry. Is it not normal that many readers naturally react negatively to poetry from their perceptions of the technical or formal linguistic machineries or devices in written texts? These devices, all too often, rudely confront and force many a reader from a rewarding poetic adventure.

Not even well intentioned explanations of the technicalities of poems can successfully change these fairly common perceptions of poetry. Neither explaining that what is referred to as "uneven lines" are specific arrangements of "sounds of words" that constitute lines or verses nor demonstrating how metre as measured movement verse ad the length of lines can generated any renewed interest in poetry. Ask the reader if he did enjoy the rhythmic effects produced by systematized deployments of stressed and unstressed syllables in intonational languages as well as structured emphasis on syllables in tonal languages, the response would be, how can one enjoy what cannot be accessed in the first place? No one could blame such a reader because iterative structuring of sounds through peculiar lineation configurations in the written text constitute graphic representations poetic effects that become truly manifest only through performance or oral re-creation. Thus the frustrated reader is cheated out of being part of rhythmic impetus of poetry by written texts even though this rhythmic impetus remains an indispensable vehicle for the poetic experiences that connects man with the essence being.

Modern critical theories do not ease the pressure put on the reader either. For example, Russian Formalism postulates "literariness" as what distinguishes poetry from other discourse because it "defamiliarizes" by making language draw attention to itself. By insisting the poetic experience be seen virtually as mere sensitivity to the distinctive devices by which meaning is either deployed or subverted rather than a participation in the meaning implicated in poetry, formalist approaches to poetry subvert the fervour necessary for a poetic involvement in life. Is it any wonder that that poems are regarded as obscure propositions that have little or no reward to offer for the great effort they demand? How then can these kinds of discourse generate attraction towards poetic existence?

This uncomplimentary view of poetry, which is based on the premise of impenetrability, seems quite logical but it is also important to not that it originates from "restrictive or specialized" consideration of poetry as a distinctive kind of verbal discourse. Futhermore, this attitude is underscored by a total reliance on the "formal cause" in utter disregard for the "material cause" of poetry. To have a full understanding of what poetry is, not only should both causes be taken into consideration, their coalescence is a vital function of the formation of poetic visioning which is reflected in the Coleridgean concept of an organic form that flows naturally from the matter to compel the desired poetic involvement. Thus poetry, even in this more restricted sense of being verbal artifact, intensely communicates what resonates in the soul of man.

While the Greek word poesis (which etymologically spun off such words as poem, poet, poetry, poetic and poetics amongst others and denotatively means "making or to make") supports this specialized consideration of poetry as an artistic verbal construct, it also recognizes a wide array of creations or products. Poesis as "making or to make" implies that poetry can be applied to any object fabricated by human beings or even any action or activity that stands in contrast to a natural phenomenon. This explains why Plato, in the tenth book of The Republic, correlates products of verbal fabrications with those of carpentry and warfare and proceeds to apply the same standards in evaluating their usefulness. In effect while it is acceptable to regard those who artistically produce oral or written works as poets and their products as poems in the specialized sense, it is also acceptable to regard, in a general sense, all things produced by man as poems while all humans are poets because they produce things and initiate actions that can be regarded as poems.

If the core attributes of aesthetic verbal discourses form the base of all human products and activities, then it follows that the products and activities are poetic. For example the rhythm, which flows from the measured movements or "metred language," creates an aesthetic harmony that showers forth intense experiences and profound insights. When this aesthetic harmony is infused into all other human products as well as into the lives of individuals and social groupings, they become poetic. Other verbal discourses (be they literary - prose, drama, fable- scientific treatise, philosophic musings, or historical records), mathematical equations, artistic types like painting, music, architecture etc and other non-verbal and sign-related texts are poems, in the general sense, if they thrive on the poetic thought and impulse. In like manner, all human products, activities and visions are enriched and made more worthwhile by being poetically realised.Please note that this sample paper on Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Poetic Existence: A Personal and Social Imperative will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes paper at affordable prices!

How to live peacefully within a society may be one of the most important concepts ever debated. Many great thinkers have done extensive work on this particular issue. In "Hobbes Leviathan," Thomas Hobbes argues that humans can not live peacefully within a society unless there is a single sovereign power to enforce laws and govern that society. However, there are examples of other creatures that do live peacefully in a functioning society that have no sovereign power to govern them. Hobbes clearly recognizes this as an argument against him and attempts to justify his claim using bees and ants as an example of creatures that do live together peacefully with no sovereign power. He argues that humans cannot be compared equally to bees and ants since there are distinct differences between then. Although I do think that there are very distinct social differences when comparing humans to bees and ants, I believe that Hobbes justification for this can be proven wrong through recent studies on bee and ant colonies.

Hobbes explains that humans in their natural condition are always at constant war with each other to satisfy their selfish interests. In this condition, humans desire peace, yet their own passions go contrary to keeping peace so they will remain at war. Hence, he argues that there must be a single sovereign power over them to force them to live in peace. He states that for humans, a sovereign power is essential for "getting themselves out from the miserable condition of war, which is necessarily consequent to the natural passions of men, when there is no visible power to tie them to there punishment (Hobbes 117)." He continues by explaining that nations must have only one sovereign judgment to follow or they will not be able to function properly, nor will they have security against enemies because they will be constantly distracted by each other with all their conflicting opinions. He states that if the actions of humans are "directed according to their particular judgments, and particular appetites, they can expect no defense, no protection neither against a common enemy, nor against the injuries of one another (Hobbes 118)." Hence, humans must have a single sovereign power to rule them or there is no chance of peace.

Hobbes makes every attempt to argue that humans cannot live peacefully by simply agreeing with each other to live that way, but require a power over them to uphold this agreement. However, one argument against this claim is the fact that other species do live peacefully in functioning societies without any sovereign power forcing this peace upon them. Hobbes recognizes this argument and makes an attempt to justify it by describing bee and ant colonies. Hobbes clearly choose bees and ants since they are perfect examples of creatures which live together peacefully, all working together for the good of their community, yet have no higher power to over them to uphold this. Hobbes justifies this by presenting six reasons why human communities are very different from those of ants and bees, and hence no logical comparison should be made between the two. All six follow from the assumption that bees and ants do not posses the ability to reason or rationalize. First, Hobbes points out that humans are always in competition with one another which provokes them to go to war. Ants and bees, on the other hand, do not feel compelled to compete with one another and hence will not have this problem. Second, Hobbes believs that humans are more prone to "procure the private good of themselves, and if the public interests cross the private, humans prefer the private (11)." However, ants and bees cannot see any difference between their common good and private good and since they are naturally driven towards the private good, the will naturally serve the common good. Third, bees and ants do not have, "the use of reason" so they are without the ability to analyze any problem in their daily routine. Contrary to this, humans will reason out better and more efficient ways of managing their community and hence think themselves better fit to govern it. Forth, ants and bees do not have any language and therefore cannot discuss with others the concept of good and evil. Therefore, unlike humans, ants and bees will not stir up trouble through these discussions. Fifth, bees and ants are irrational creatures and "cannot distinguish between injury and damage." Hence, when they are at ease they are content with their society. Humans, on the other hand, love to show off their intelligence and thus will become troublesome when they are at ease since they will desire to control their community as a display of wisdom. Sixth, bees and ants naturally agree to keep peace, but humans require a covenant. Hence, since Hobbes previously argues that, "a covenant made based on the trust of once another is void, but if there is a common power over them to force them to keep this covenant, it is not void there must be a sovereign power to enforce these covenants and keep peace (Hobbes 6)"

Custom Essays on Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes

Although at first glance Hobbes argument may seem logical, a little research and insight into this matter will show that it does not hold. This can be demonstrated by the fact that Hobbes argument is based on either his own assumption or what was believed about ants and bees in his day. His arguments are based on his assumption that ants and bees cannot reason or rationalize and hence cannot be compared to humans. However, a resent article written by Dr. Ed Vargo at North Carolina University clearly shows this assumption to be false. In the article, Vargo claims that "queen and worker ants in an ant society are often at odds about the proportion of new male and female ants raised in their colonies (Vargo)." Vargo continues to explain that worker ants will kill off a certain numbers of males to increase the female population. However, different ant colonies have very different ratios of male to female populations. He explains that this is due to the fact that the queen ant can decide the sex of each unborn ant and will enforce her own personal preference of what sex she wants more of. However, the worker ants will disagree with her witch causes a power struggle. "The root power struggles between queens and workers results form their different interests (Vargo)." Likewise, bees show an amazing ability to reason as well. According to the French researcher Martin Giurfa, bees "excel at cognitive tests normally performed by lab primates and human volunteers (Giurfa)." He claims that his studies can prove that "Abstract rules can be mastered by honey bees (Giurfa)." Hence, Hobbes is way off by his claim that ants and bees cannot reason or rationalize.

Hobbes argument that humans cannot live peacefully without the existence of a sovereign power to enforce peace may not be quite as true as he believed. Considering that there are species that can reason and rationalize and at the same time live peacefully in functioning societies with no sovereign power to enforce peace, one must continue to ask the question, "why must this be impossible for humans?" We can only hope one day that like these ant and bee colonies, humans can figure out how to willfully live together as well.

Works Cited

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, 11.

Vargo, Ed. Science Daily Article. Augest 0, 001. http//fluid.stanford.edu/~mbrennan/interests/insects/ant_sex_ratio.html

Giurfa, Martin. San Francisco Chronicle article. April 1, 001. http//faculty.nl.edu/jste/Animal%0Behavior/bees.htmPlease note that this sample paper on Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Living Peacefully in Society according to Thomas Hobbes will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The life all shit

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on the life all shit. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality the life all shit paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in the life all shit, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your the life all shit paper at affordable prices!

Animal Testing

Animal testing can be defined as taking animals of all sorts to go under experiments under their own will. Scientists of today are testing products of highly regarded companies on poor, defenseless animals. Everything from make-up to household products is killing millions of animals each year. These animals are kept in tiny, dirty cages and live in the most miserable conditions. The animal tests are useless, and prove nothing to the well being of human beings. The number of animals killed in experiments each year is horrifying, and shows that humans care nothing about nature's creatures.

Animal testing is cruel. Dogs, monkeys, rabbits and many other different species of animals are kept in tiny, confined cages with barely any food or water. Feces are scattered every where, and parasites infest the cages. Tests, such as the Draize test, is the number one test done on rabbits. A solution of liquid, flake, granule and other powdered substances is dropped into the eyes of the rabbit. Scientists inspect the eye to see if any effects occur. Their eyes will likely be swollen and expand twice the normal size, causing them to go blind. These rabbits live through and die with the excruciating pain, anywhere from seventy-two hours to nine days. No pain killers or anesthetics are given to the animals, as scientists' suspect it may 'interfere' with the results. The Draize test is responsible for the suffering and death of thousands of rabbits each year in the United States alone. Dogs, cats, guinea pigs, and monkeys suffer even more than rabbits. Due to their sensitive skin, lotions, perfumes, and even sunscreen will be applied directly to the flesh. In most cases, the substance will eat its way through the skin, killing the animal in two to three days.

The tests that are done on animals will not bring new cures or prevent any diseases. The Draize test kills thousands of animals each year, yet does not give a single piece of information to help in the well being of humans. The Lethal Dose test (LD-50) measures the amount of toxic-substance that will, in a single dose, kill a percentage of animals in a test group. The substance is forced into an animal's throat or will be pumped into the stomach by a tube, which will most likely cause death by stomach rupture and the sheer bulk of the chemical dosage. It can also be injected under the skin, a vein, into the peritoneal lining of the abdomen, applied to eyes, rectum, vagina, or forcibly inhaled through a gas mask. This test doesn't accurately measure human health hazards and is crude and imprecise. The test results can be affected by age, sex of the animal, their housing and nutritional conditions, temperature, time of day and year and the exact method to administer the substance. The LD-50 test has come under pressure for its cruel effects and inaccuracy.

Animal testing is killing millions of animals each year; everything from rabbits, to lab mice and to man's best friend, the dog. Rabbits, whose large eyes, docility, and breeding habits have made them a favorite for Draize tests, have a much higher pain threshold than humans do, as well as a third eyelid and different corneal structure. Embryos of chicken eggs are also not spared. A few drops of suspected irritant, is placed on the membrane of the embryo and the damage will be recorded. During the LD-50 test, the scientists' will wait for fifty percent of the animals to die (forty to two-hundred) before recording the results. Vivisection, the experimentation on animals, kills seventeen to seventy million animals in the United States alone. The Animal Welfare Act (A.W.A) requires labs to report the number of animals used in experiments, but the act does not cover mice, rats and birds. It is unbelievable since these animals are used in eighty to ninety percent of all experiments. Due to the fact that these animals are not covered by act, they remain uncounted and the number of animals that suffer each year is remarkably huge.

Some people believe that animal testing is the only way to research products and cures. This is not the only path, and research shows that ninety percent of the time the experiment is useless. It is cruel and unjust by torturing millions of animals since all the recorded information reveals that animal testing in unnecessary and those alternatives do exist and is open to be used. Scientists' can now test in environments they will enjoy and make human life safer and better. It is efficient and reliable. It takes less time to complete, costs only a fraction of what animal experiments cost, and people will not be plagued by species indifferences that make the extrapolation difficult or impossible. To define animal testing, it simply states that new techniques for cell and tissue testing in test tubes can now supplant animal toxicology results.

To prevent animal testing from continuing, the consumer can purchase "Cruelty-free" products, which are not tested on animals. These products do not contain animal ingredients and can be made entirely from plant extracts, herbs, flowers, and many other ingredients proven to be safe. The list below contains all of the companies currently testing their products on animals. If the consumer stops buying their products, the company will surely reconsider animal testing and use alternatives. (Those marked with an asterisk () are presently observing a moratorium on (current suspension of) animal testing.

Arm & Hammer (Church & Dwight)

Bic Corporation

Block Drug Co. (Carpet Fresh, Lava, Polident, Sensodyne, Tegrin)

Boyle-Midway (Reckitt Benckiser)

Braun (Gillette Company)

Chesebrough-Ponds (Faberg, Ponds, Vaseline)

Church & Dwight (Arm & Hammer, Arrid, Lady's Choice, Nair, Pearl Drops)

Clairol (Procter & Gamble)

Clorox (ArmorAll, Formula 40, FreshStep, Glad, Pine-Sol, SoftScrub, S.O.S., Tilex)

Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Ajax, Fab, Hills Pet Nutrition, Mennen, Palmolive, SoftSoap, Speed Stick)

Coty (Adidas, Davidoff, JOOP!, Jovan, Lancaster, Rimmel, Stetson)

Cover Girl (Proctor & Gamble)

Del Laboratories (Commerce Drug, Flame Glow, New York Color, Propa PH, Sally Hansen)

Dial Corporation (Purex, Renuzit)

Drackett Products Co. (S.C. Johnson & Son)

Erno Laszlo

Gillette Co. (Braun, Duracell)

Helene Curtis Industries (Finesse, Salon Selectives, THermasilk, Unilever)

Johnson & Johnson (Aveeno, Clean & Clear, Neutrogena)

Kimberley-Clark Corp. (Huggies, Kleenex, Kotex, Scott Paper)

Lamaur (ColorSoft, PermaSoft)

Lever Bros. (Unilever)

L'Oral U.S.A.

Max Factor (Proctor & Gamble)

Mead

Melaleuca

Mennen Co. (Colgate-Palmolive)

Neoteric Cosmetics

Noxell (Proctor & Gamble)

Olay Co./Oil of Olay (Proctor & Gamble)

Oral-B (Gillette Co.)

Pantene (Proctor & Gamble)

Pfizer (BenGay, Desitin, Listerene, Lubriderm, Plax, Schick, Visine)

Physique (Proctor & Gamble)

Playtex Products (Baby Magic, Banana Boat)

Proctor & Gamble Co. (Clairol, Cover Girl, Crest, Giorgio, Iams, Max Factor, Physique, Tide)

Reckitt Benckiser (Coty, Lysol, Mop & Glo, Resolve, Spray 'N Wash, Woolite)

Richardson-Vicks (Proctor & Gamble)

Sally Hansen (Del Laboratories)

Schering-Plough (Bain de Soleil, Coppertone, Dr. Scholl's)

Schick (Pfizer)

S.C. Johnson (Drano, Fantastik, Glade, Pledge, Shout, Windex, Ziploc)

SoftSoap Enterprises (Colgate-Palmolive)

Suave (Unilever)

M (Post-It, Scotch)

Unilever (Calvin Klein, Diversey, Helene Curtis, Lever Bros., Mentadent, Suave)

Vidal Sassoon (Proctor & Gamble)

Animal testing is cruel, inaccurate, and wrong. It makes people believe that animals are voiceless, have no sense of feeling or pain. Would you ever consider giving something of poison to your pet? Something that you and your family would never eat or use? Never in my life would I do such a cruel act. Animal testing must be immediately banned.

Please note that this sample paper on the life all shit is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on the life all shit, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on the life all shit will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Chosen

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Chosen. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Chosen paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Chosen, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Chosen paper at affordable prices!

Conflicts in The Chosen

In reading The Chosen, one is exposed to conflicts between characters throughout the book, which Potok expresses in three main conflicts father against father, son against son, and father against son. Each variation of conflict has a very important significance to the main theme of conflicts among four Jewish males throughout the book. In post-Holocaust times, can it be assumed that all Jews would share a common belief system and have no conflicts?

In The Chosen, the father against father conflict is a result of clashes between David Malters and Reb Saunders. Each held drastically opposite views on life, parenting, religion and most every issue. This created major conflict at a time when American Jews who had escaped Germany were beginning to relay horrific stories from the Holocaust. While David Malter and Reb Saunders are both fathers and religious scholars, they demonstrate fundamentally different beliefs about disciplining children and religion. Reb Saunders and David Malter are very different in their ways. Reb is a Hasidic Jew and isolationist fanatic while David is an Orthodox Jew, more open-minded and interactive with the modern world around him. Reb's traditionalist mindset is stubborn and parochial. For most of the novel, he refuses to consider the outside world or interpret Judaism in ways other than his own. David Malter, on the other hand, remains tolerant of other points of view, even Reb Saunders. Most important, David Malter is willing to adapt his religious beliefs to incorporate contemporary issues. For Reb Saunders, being Jewish means one must accept a special set of obligations like studying the Torah and serving God. "We are commanded to study His Torah! We are commanded to sit in the light of the Presence! It is for this that we were created! . . . Not the world, but the people of Israel (Potok 18)! For David Malter, being Jewish is less rigid and more about possessing a certain intellectual and spiritual mindset and honoring obligations that will, in turn, provide meaning. The statement "man must fill his life with meaning, meaning is not automatically given to life (Potok 17), reflects David Malters growing feeling that it is not enough to wait passively for biblical prophesy, as Reb Saunders does. Unlike Reb Saunders, David Malter believes that religion should impact politics, and that it is important for Jews to actively engage the outside world. At times, each father feels threatened by the others views. At other times, each father displays strong respect for the other. The essence of different value systems and opposing viewpoints between these fathers is the core catalyst for conflict as the story develops.

As the old saying goes, like father like son. "I'm my father's son, remember? I'm the inheritor of the dynasty. Number one on our catechism Treat the son as you would the father, because one day the son will be the father" (Potok 178). It isn't surprising that, the sons of these two strong-willed men conflict with each other in a similar fashion as their fathers throughout the pages of The Chosen. Danny and Reuven become friends in an unlikely way. While playing an interschool baseball game, Reuven was pitching and Daniel hit the ball and shattered Reuven's glasses. Reuven went to the hospital for immediate eye surgery. After the eye heals, Danny went to Reuven to beg his forgiveness and the two boys became fast friends. Reuven's family has more flexible religious customs, while Danny's relatives represent very strict Hasidic beliefs with limited views. "My father doesn't like us to mix with outsiders" (Potok 16). The two boys embark upon adulthood in New York in the 140's and together try to negotiate issues typical for that era. Reuvens father becomes an outspoken proponent of Israel as a Jewish homeland while Dannys father is fanatical in his belief that only the Messiah could lead the Jews to Israel. It is at this point when Reb Saunders goes to the extreme of demanding that his son cease being friends with Reuven because of a speech on Zionism made by Reuven's father. "Danny was not to see me talk to me, be found within four feet of me. My father and I had been excommunicated from the Saunders family" (Potok 1). During this ban, Danny and Reuven continue to communicate through eye contact and subtle gestures. The look on Dannys face, though, when I saw him for the first time, helped a little. He passed me in the hallway, his face a suffering mask of pain and compassion. I thought for a moment he would speak to me, but he didnt. Instead, he brushed against me and managed to touch my hand for a second. His touch and his eyes spoke the words that his lips couldnt. I told myself it was bitter and ironic that my father needed to have a heart attack in order for some contact to be established once again between myself and Danny (Potok 41). This, they learn, is a non verbal means of perpetuating a friendship. As the boys grow into young men, they discover in the other a lost spiritual brother and a link to an unexplored world that neither had ever considered before. In effect, they exchange places, and find a peace that neither would have gained without the other.

Order Custom The Chosen paper

The last, and one of the most important conflicts in the book, is father against son. Fathers and sons cannot choose each other, but this lack of choice does not make their relationships any less meaningful. These conflicts may not be quite as obvious because they are typically more silently communicated. Danny and his father speak only to one another when Reb Saunders asks him questions about the Talmud on Shabbat. "They never talk, abba. Except when they study Talmud" (Potok 47). Primarily, this stems from the respect that is expected to be shown between parent and child in a Hasidic family. An example of father-son conflict takes place within Danny Saunders when he is torn between a life devoted to the intellectual study of psychology which he realizes is not congruent with his Hasidic religious views because it emphasizes a non-religious view of human nature. He realizes that he faces a decision of deeply disappointing his father by not following in his footsteps of living a life devoted strictly to the Hasidic traditions or foregoing that which his heart desires. Although very intelligent, Danny has never been to a movie or a museum, but he secretly goes to the library every day, and reads secular books. Danny becomes increasingly torn between honoring his father and his religious upbringing and his intellectual hunger. Even when Danny was still very young, Reb Saunders realized that in his boy the dazzling intellect was growing into a dominant force. "I cried inside my heart. I went away and cried to the Master of the Universe, What have you done to me? A mind like this I need for a son? A heart I need for a son, a soul I need for a son, compassion I want from my son, righteousness, mercy, strength to suffer and carry pain, that I want from my son, not a mind without a soul (Potok 15)!

Despite what can seem like insurmountable differences in The Chosen, everyone has similarities as well. There is good in everyone and two people are bound to share some common views. By dwelling on the similarities and respecting the fact that everyone doesn't see eye to eye on every single issue, it can be possible for individuals to cohabitate peacefully and sometimes even enjoy sharing attributes of their differences. For, in sharing these differences, diverse citizens learn about perspectives beyond their own and can experience growth. While some people remain more narrow-minded than others, they may refuse to accept a lifestyle or a belief. But, they may begin, little by little, to consider tolerating the differences. Like it or not, the world is full of many different people and no matter who the group of people, or what past experiences they may share, there will always be conflicts because no two people are alike.Please note that this sample paper on The Chosen is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Chosen, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Chosen will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Child abuse

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Child abuse. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Child abuse paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Child abuse, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Child abuse paper at affordable prices!

Hypothesis Child Abuse is a big problem in Australia. The legal rights of children, and organizations dealing with children affected by child abuse, urgently need to be strengthened.

Types of Abuse

First, in order to understand child abuse it is helpful to know exactly what it means. There are many legal and operational variations in the definition of child abuse. However, all definitions refer to the physical or psychological damage caused to the child by the abusive behavior of others, or the failure of others to protect a child from such damage. Most commonly, the categories of abuse cover physical, sexual and emotional abuse and neglect.

~ Physical abuse is any non-accidental physical injury inflicted on a child. This may include beatings, burns and scalds, fractures, poisoning, bruises or welts, internal injuries, shaking injuries or strangulation.

Order Custom Child abuse paper

~ Sexual abuse is any sexual behavior imposed on a child. The child is considered to be unable to alter and/or understand the perpetrators behavior due to his or her early stage of development and/or powerlessness in the situation. The perpetrators position of authority and/or trust enables him or her implicitly or directly to coerce the child into sexual compliance.

~ Emotional abuse is a constant attitude or behavior towards a child, which is detrimental to or impairs the childs emotional and/or physical development. This may take the form of scape goating, emotional rejection, isolation, or continuing verbal abuse.

~ Neglect is any serious omission or commission by a person, which jeopardizes or impairs the childs physical, intellectual, or emotional development. A child who is neglected may be consistently dirty and unwashed, without appropriate supervision for extended periods of time and, therefore, may be at risk of injury or harm, constantly tired, hungry, listless, and with medical conditions related to poor hygiene.

As an example of child abuse I would like to share with you the story of David Pelzer his story can be found in his autobiography called "A Child Called It". In the book he relates that for his developmentary years form age ½ to 1 he was denied food, beaten, and physically and mentally tortured in various ways. Some of these include being smashed face-first into mirrors, forced to eat the contents of his sibling's diapers and rotten meat, forced to swallow spoonfuls of ammonia. This was all instigated by his mother a devoted den mother to the Cub Scouts in her care and nurturing to her other children but not to David, whom she referred to as "it". She starved him for days at a time and forced him to vomit after every day at school to make sure he wasn't sneaking any food. When he tried stealing scraps from the garbage, she laced the trashcan with ammonia. She forced him to take ice-cold baths with just his nose above water. She often locked him in the bathroom with a bucket of ammonia and Clorox (a deadly chemical) the toxic fumes in the 'gas chamber' as he called it, burnt his throat and nearly killed him. His mother beat him with a dog chain, a broom, her fists, burnt his hand on a gas stove, stabbed him in the chest, then left him to clean up the wound.

Although this is an extreme case of child abuse it highlights the need to protect children from such acts of violence.

In Australia an estimated 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 7 boys have been sexually abused before the age of sixteen! Most are abused by family members or others in a position of trust, many of them pillars of the community. Less than 1% of perpetrators are ever convicted of the abuse that is reported. Only 8% of abuse is reported. Perpetrators ensure that victims are too afraid or ashamed to tell, or have no one they can tell. For most, the abuse continues for years. All are emotionally scarred for life. Unless they are helped to heal many later turn to drugs; some die of overdoses. Many attempt suicide; some succeed. (Australian Child protection Alliance)

Figure 1 is the complied data from the Kids Help Line in South Australia during 001-00Figure is the graphing of data in 001. It is the calling profile of Kids Help Line in South Australia. Females made 7% of the calls conserning child abuse, males made 1%. Figure graphs the age and sex of each caller calling about child abuse.What is being done?

The government has established specialist police, education, health and welfare services to provide assistance to victims and their families. Protective programs have been introduced into schools. Policies have been formulated and other procedures have been updated. Legal reforms have been implemented and financial assistance has been given to self-help groups, strategies to work with abusers and a growing awareness of the problem in the community. This is helping to change attitudes towards child victims and those who hurt them.

A convicted child abuse offender will be place in custody for a minimum of 10 years with the option of bail in 5 years. Many believe that that amount of time is not nearly long enough. Persons convicted of not reporting abuse to the appropriate authorities are placed in custody for a minimum of years with bail available to the offenders as early as 6 months after being placed in custody.

What needs to be done in the future?

The greatest chance we have to prevent it.

Prevention of child abuse must be tackled on a number of levels

Primary Prevention is everyones responsibility. The goal is to stop abuse before it happens. Part of this is changing attitudes towards violence, protecting childrens rights and changing the way we behave as a society.

Secondary Prevention includes the recognition that parenting is difficult and that it can create stressful situations. Family support, respite care, personal safety programs, self esteem groups, community awareness programs, parenting skills courses, non-violent conflict resolution courses and self-help groups all can assist in preventing abuse. This is the responsibility of agencies, volunteer groups and others who must offer parents and other caregivers support rather than judgmental criticisms.

Tertiary Prevention is the responsibility of government agencies, which must act to protect a child who has already been abused. They must provide the best services available. Their duty is to ensure the child is safe from future harm.

The community needs to have harsher penalties for child abuse offenders. It is thought by some that we should follow some other countries leads which place the offenders in custody for life. It is the view taken by many that as a nation we are too lax in our child abuse laws and the punishment of the offenders.

Conclusion

Although a variety of child abuse intervention strategies have been introduced around Australia, few have been subject to evaluation. We know little if anything about the relative effectiveness and efficiency of child abuse programs in Australia.

Child abuse needs to be tackled on all fronts, social, legal, personal, and if we want to prevent it, we need to provide support for parents, research information for professionals and a community, which refuses to allow violence against its most vulnerable members.

The legal rights of abused children, the need for preventative measures have come along way from what they once were, BUT they still need to improve in order to insure the safety of our future generations.

Information found

www.law.washington.edu/streetlaw/ lessons/ChildAbuse.ppt

http//www.public.asu.edu/~ksten/Types.

http//www.slosipe.org/TRAIN/santabarbara/Mod4/pg.htm

http//www.geocities.com/Heartland/Bluffs/5400/abuse.html

http//www.aic.gove.au/publications/vt/vt.html#

David Pelzer, autobiography. "A Child Called 'IT'"

Information Found http//users.hunterlink.net.au/~derf/acpa/index.htm

Also see http//brisbane.apana.org.au/~cpds/Teams/Articles/Paul#Paul

Statistics found in "Child Abuse South Australia 001-00" Report, www.kidshelp.com.au

Information found in http//www.aic.gov.au/publications/vt/vt.html#

See Above

See Above

See Above

Please note that this sample paper on Child abuse is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Child abuse, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Child abuse will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Betrayl of Parents

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Betrayl of Parents. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Betrayl of Parents paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Betrayl of Parents, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Betrayl of Parents paper at affordable prices!

When one thinks of parents, one thinks of parents as the source of protection and love. However, in many fairytales, parents are portrayed as unreliable, and sometimes the biological mother or father is the actual culprits of their children's ill fate. For example, why would Little Red Riding Hood's mother actually let her young daughter travel in the woods, in winter, by herself? The mother knows there's a chance that her daughter could get raped, beaten, or killed. In "The Tiger's Bride", the father of Beauty loses her to the Beast in a game of cards! How reliable is that for a father? In Cinderella's case, the parents are even more responsible for the hardship she goes through. We often think that the step-parents are the malevolent force in the plot such as Cinderella's step-mother causes her grief and torment. While this might be seemly true, if one looks deeper into the plot, the realization that the real mother and father are responsible begins to surface. Even in the Disney version, where was the Cinderella's father when her step-mother treated her horribly? Could he not control his new wife and protect Cinderella? Readers have been tricked into thinking that the step-mother is the real demon when the biological parents deserve to be punished.

Cinderella is really a story about a lustful father and evil, selfish mother. In "Catskin", when the queen is on her deathbed, she tells her husband that he must never marry again unless he finds another who can fit her ring. This selfish act leads to extremely bad circumstances for the king and his daughter. At last, when the King has finished grieving and wants to remarry, he sets out to find another who might fit into the queen's ring. When the father realizes only his daughter can fit the ring, he loses sight of morality and wants to subject the both of them to incest. He must realize that forcing his daughter to marry him is a severe sin no father should ever commit, yet his carnal desires lead him astray. The father is also selfish; he chooses his own happiness over his daughter's. The only choices "Catskin" are either to marry her father and sink into incestuous sin or run away; thus, she must run away from her own father. She has to escape from her own father to be safe.

In another tale similar to "Catskin", called "Donkeyskin", the queen tells the king before she dies that he must never remarry unless he finds a woman superior to her in goodness and beauty. Again, the woman is very wicked for wanting to limit her husband's happiness. She wants her husband to be bound to her forever even if she is dead. This sort of wickedness only leads the king to fall in love with is daughter. Only she is superior to the queen in goodness and beauty. Even though "Donkeyskin" is a fairytale, the terms which the queen bound the king are totally subjective. The king could think anyone is superior in goodness and beauty; it didn't have to be his daughter! Again, the father chooses desire over fatherly duty; his only concern is to be happy no matter what the costs. He does not think about the implications of his incestuous lust and how it would devastate his daughter. The daughters in both "Catskin" and "Donkeyskin" are the moral ones; the people who have their heads straight. It is up to them to maintain purity and sanctity of the social norms.

The mother could be seen as even more responsible and wicked than the father for she is one who stirs up trouble in the first place. She is the one who sets up the situation for her husband's remarriage. But the father is not without fault; he became a vile, lustful man after his daughter. The only good one is the child herself.

Custom Essays on The Betrayl of Parents

Even in the Disney version, the step-mother and step-sisters are very mean to Cinderella. They make her do all these tedious tasks such as picking peas out of the ashes and such, but these tacks are merely annoying. They do not rape her or put her up for prostitution; there is no immoral task forced upon Cinderella. What are some tiresome tasks when compared to being degraded to incest? The severity of Disney's Cinderella situation seems less than Catskin's.

And what of a father who wagers his child on gambling? That is exactly the unfortunate case for Beauty in, "The Tiger's Bride" by Angela Carter. "Father lost me to The Beast at cards" is the first line of the story which sends off a gloomy and disheartening feeling. The father sacrifices his daughter so that he may be freed from the Beast. This act manifests the irresponsibility and extreme selfishness of Beauty's father.

Snow White's father is not at all a loving father either. After his wife dies of illness, he remarries a woman who treats his daughter quiet horribly. In the Disney version, the jealous queen takes away Snow White's beautiful clothes and jewels and sends her to the servants' quarters. Where was the king when all this happened?! Would he not stand up to the queen to protect his biological child?

The mirror which the queen asks everyday, "who is the fairest of us all?" could be interpreted as the king. A constant struggle between the queen and Snow White exists as to who is treasured more by the king. The step-mother fears that her husband might love his daughter more, and when she thinks this might be true, she sends Snow White into the forest to be killed. Again the duty of a father would be to look after his daughter despite that he is a king. Did he fail to notice that his daughter was missing and why was there no search for her?

In "The Snow Child" by Angela Carter, the male known as the Count creates Snow White; it is plausible that readers view him as her father for he created her. But by and by, he corrupts her and she begins to lose her purity. Material possessions such as a fur coat and leather boots given to her from the Count signify the changes in the child. She appeared into the story stark naked and ends up fully clothed. This transition indicates that the child has been altered, perhaps corrupted and has lost her innocence. At the end of the story, she has an accidental death. But even death can not stop the Count from using her body one last time for his own pleasure, "the Count got off his horse, unfastened his breeches and thrust his virile member into the dead girl…... he was soon finished." This rather sickening description reveals that Snow White's father tainted her purity by exploiting and abusing her sexually.

If the Count is her father, then the Countess must be seen as her mother. Her jealousy of the child led to the accidental death; Snow White fell off the horse when she attempted to pick a rose at the Countess' request. The Countess' intention was to kill Snow White for she asked Snow White to fetch her brooch in the frozen pond, "'Dive in and fetch it for me' she sad; she thought the girl would drown." Neither the Countess nor the Count was good parents to Snow White.

Little Red Riding Hood's parents, although, not really mentioned in the stories, still are also responsible for her death. In all the versions, she lives far from Grandmother thus requiring for her to walk through the woods. She is simply a little girl, why would her mother say, "I want you to go and see how your grandmother is faring, for I've heard that she's ill. Take her some cakes and this little pot of butter." If Grandmother is so sick, why doesn't the mother go to visit and comfort her? She must know traveling through the woods is not very safe for she says, "when you're out in the woods, walk properly and don't stray from the path". When bad things happen to the little girl, the responsibility can not be all put onto her. Small children and even teenagers rely on their parents to watch out for them and keep them safe. In Little Red Riding Hood's case, her mother could be seen as sending her daughter to her death.

But of course, we can not be too harsh on these fairytales for then; there would be no fairytale to read after all. However one thing is certain, the parents are not at all portrayed as the reliable figures that they should be.

Please note that this sample paper on The Betrayl of Parents is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Betrayl of Parents, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Betrayl of Parents will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Iraq War Resolution

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Iraq War Resolution. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Iraq War Resolution paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Iraq War Resolution, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Iraq War Resolution paper at affordable prices!

The Iraq War Resolution

Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq Resolution of 00

General Purpose Congressional/Presidential Resolution with Iraq/Saddam Hussein

Specific Purpose To inform

Buy The Iraq War Resolution term paper

Thesis To inform my audience of current events involving Iraq and its President Saddam Hussein, including Congressional/Presidential decisions and world opinions on the matter of military action to enforce UN resolutions.

Attention Getting "Those who chose to live in denial may eventually be forced to live in fear,"

Introduction

These words were addressed by President Bush as he signed the Iraq War Resolution, a resolution that entitled him to use military power in Iraq. A resolution that Congress and the House of Representatives, after careful deliberation, passed overwhelmingly, determining that Iraq's persistence to defy United Nation resolutions needed to be dealt with. UN resolutions that Iraq agreed to as far back as 11 when they lost the Gulf War, and have spent the last decade breaking.

What powers have Congress given the President in the Iraq War Resolution? We'll look into that

Why have Congress and the House of Representatives called Iraq "a threat to national security" and have decided to force Iraq to abide to UN resolutions "by any means possible"? Is it a little harsh? We'll look into that also.

And what is the UNs' view on America's decision to use, if necessary, military power to force Iraq to follow these UN resolutions, and what stance have countries taken in this predicament. By golly, we're gonna look into that too.

Transition

Because this threat involving the US and Iraq is real, and Iraq is a force that Bush declared in an address to the UN as "a grave and gathering danger."

Body

I. The joint resolution that Congress passed, cited as the "Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq Resolution of 00" gives Bush power to use the military, as well as guidelines to follow limiting this power.

A. Congress entitled the President with the power to use military force in the case

1. To defend national security of the United States against a continuing threat posed against Iraq

. To enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions

B. The President must inform Congress and the House of Representatives an attack on Iraq 48 hours after the attack

1. Some argue that to give the right to the President to launch a war with Iraq and not have to tell Congress or the House about it for 48 powers gives the President too much power and is unconstitutional

C. But, accusations of its unconstitutional nature have been brushed aside by politicians, given that the Senate requires the President to site after these 48 hours that further diplomatic negotiations wouldn't protect the national security of the US or accomplish the enforcement of all UN Security Council resolutions, emphasized as the second most important thing to the safety of America.

II. Iraq has broken every resolution that the UN Security Council had created after Desert Storm.

A. Congress reported that in 11, the UN Security Council Resolution 688, demanded that the Iraqi regime cease the repression of its own people. This has not happened. The UN Commission on Human Rights found tens of thousands of political opponents and ordinary citizens have been subjected to arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, summary execution, and torture by beating and burning, electric shock, starvation, mutilation, and rape. Wives are tortured in front of their husbands, children in the presence of their parents.

B. Congress reported that in 11, the UN Security Council Resolution 687, demanded that Iraq renounce all involvement with terrorism, and permit no terrorist organizations to operate in Iraq, yet Iraq continues to shelter and support terrorist organizations that direct violence against Iran, Israel, and Western governments. In 1, Iraq attempted to assassinate former President George Bush during a visit in Kuwait, and more recently the Iraqi government openly praised the attacks of September 11th, along with harboring al Qaeda terrorists that escaped from Afghanistan.

C. Congress reported that in 11, the Iraqi regime agreed to destroy all weapons of mass destruction and prove to the world it has done so by complying with rigorous inspections. Iraq agreed. From 11 to 15, the Iraqi regime clamed to have no biological weapons. A defected senior official of the Iraqi regime exposed this as a lie, and the regime admitted to producing tens of thousands of liters of anthrax and other deadly biological agents. As far as letting UN inspectors access to verify Iraq's commitment to rid itself, well, Iraq broke its promise, spending 7 years deceiving, evading, and harassing UN inspectors before ceasing cooperation with them entirely

1. The UN Security Council demanded that Iraq fully cooperate with inspectors twice in 11, once in 14, twice in 16, three times in 17, three times in 18, and once in 1, before UN inspectors were forced out.

. President Bush said in his speech to the UN "It's been almost four years since the last UN inspectors set foot in Iraq, four years for the Iraqi regime to plan, and to build, and to test behind the cloak of secrecy"

Transition There is no doubt that Iraq defies the resolutions they had agreed to in 11, and their consistency to disregard the UN brings the question regarding other countries' opinions and support for America's military backed resolution.

III. There has been a variety of reactions to the Iraq War Resolution passed by Congress and the House, from different countries and the UN

A. Yahoo! News reports that among those that support the US include Bulgaria who has anted up an airport, Romania who has guaranteed air bases and airspace rights to US fighter jets, Qatar who is letting the Pentagon set up a command center and pre-position armored brigade equipment there, as well as the unconditional support of Australia, Poland, and Spain.

B. Yahoo news also reports that among those that criticize America's Iraq resolution supporting war to enforce UN resolutions include Tunisia's UN Noureddine Mejdoub, who says, "This war is useless because its motives are not well-founded, and because UN inspectors have been expected in Baghdad since Sept. 17th to accomplish their mission."

C. Baghdad's UN ambassador Mohammed Aldouri, among claiming that his country wasn't guilty of any accusations made by the US, was quoted in saying, "The American people do not want the inspectors to come back because if they did, they will prove the Americans have been repeating one lie after another, one allegation after another."

Conclusion

And the conflict continues each day, as America proves through its passing of the Iraq War Resolution that it is tired of playing dangerous games with Saddam Hussein, and has taken steps toward solving Iraq's deliberate attempts to slither its way out of one UN resolution after another. Congress is convinced that Iraq is potential threat to national security, and that Congress will no longer tolerate such insubordination. Can this conflict be resolved without military action? As President Bush said in its remarks to the UN,

"If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will immediately and unconditionally forswear, disclose, and remove or destroy all weapons of mass destruction, long-ranged missiles, and all related material."

"If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will immediately end all support for terrorism and act to suppress it"

"If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will cease persecution of its civilian population."

For as President Bush concluded his speech as he signed the Iraq War Resolution, "The broad resolve of our government is now clear to all, clear to everyone to see We will defend our nation, and lead others in defending the peace."Please note that this sample paper on The Iraq War Resolution is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Iraq War Resolution, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Iraq War Resolution will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!