Moving to Portland, Oregon

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Moving to Portland, Oregon. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Moving to Portland, Oregon paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Moving to Portland, Oregon, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Moving to Portland, Oregon paper at affordable prices!

1

Moving to Portland, Oregon

"Should I move to Portland with my girlfriend, or should I stay in Texas?" This was a question that recently came up in my life. I was born, and raised in Austin, never dreaming I would live anywhere else. Why would I want to? Youve got everything you need in Texas. From pickup trucks, to high school football. So, of course, moving to Oregon affected my life in many ways. I left my family behind. My friends are mere memories of my past. Even my opinions of other states have changed.Austin, Texas, music capital of the world, home of the Texas Longhorns, home to me, home to my family.

The thought of moving to Oregon arose when my girlfriend, of two and a half years, and her family decided to move here. Two and a half years is a long relationship to just let end. So I had to think about it and discuss it with my family. When I brought it up to my parents, they were supportive about it, as they always were. My mom basically told me I should do whatever I wanted to. Of course, they were quite shocked by the whole thing. Then there was my older brother, Brian, who said, "Hell yeah man, go for it!" Hes always been really supportive. My grandfather and I are very close. I was his only grandson that visited him regularly. So when I brought it up to him, he was probably more upset about it than anyone else in the family.

Write my Essay on Moving to Portland, Oregon for me

Seeing everyones reactions wasnt making my decision easy. Do I stay? Do I go? Normally, if I were to ask myself a question like this it would be a nobrainer. "Stay in

Texas! Where else is there?" Im a Texas boy, and will always be a Texas boy, no matter where I live. I kind of knew in the back of my mind that I would soon be an Oregonian.

Well, maybe not an Oregonian, but I would live in Oregon. Ending what was almost a three year relationship was just going to be too hard. I decided to prepare myself for it, and think about it as a really long vacation. Broaden my horizon on places other than Texas.

This past spring break was my first experience in Oregon. I remember it clearly. (Actually, it was overcast, cold and raining.) We stayed in a hotel on Cornell and 158th. I remember sitting there thinking to myself, "Man, all my friends are at Padre Island, enjoying their spring break at the beach, like an eighteen year old kid should. Im here in cold, rainy Boregon, but Im having a good time." This was probably the point when I decided I was moving away from home. I never really liked the sun anyway. We spent the first couple of days checking out Portland and PCC. We went down rd street and did the whole "downtown" thing. It was cool. It reminded me a lot of downtown Austin. Then came the day we were all waiting for. The Oregon coast. We wanted to see where The Goonies was filmed in Astoria. Not realizing that Astoria was the most boring place on the face of the earth. What we really wanted to see was the beach in The Goonies, with the big rocks in the water. We later found out that what we were looking for was Cannon Beach. So that was a complete waste of a day. But I did learn something from that experience. Never go to Astoria again.

Back home, I couldnt stop talking about my spring break in Oregon. I didnt even care to hear my friends stories of Padre Island about getting MIPs for being dumb and drunk. At this point I couldnt wait to move. I spent countless hours at work trying to

earn enough money for my first semester at PCC. Six and seven day weeks were normal. Overtime was a must. The more overtime, the better. Just as luck would have it, the more money I made, more things came up that required a good portion of my paycheck. I

shattered the clutch in my car. That was eight-hundred dollars gone in one day. Soon after that, I snapped a pushrod in half. That was more money gone. Between me breaking my car, and my car payments, I wasnt going to have enough money for my first semester.

With my time in Texas rapidly coming to an end, I spent most of what was left with my friends. Most of my free time, that is. Since I knew it might be a while before I made any friends in Oregon, I enjoyed every moment spent with these people who are now only memories of Dripping Springs. I say this because now that they have graduated high school and summer has passed, most of them have moved out of Drippin to go to college. Though they were what I considered to be my friends, they were not of any more importance than any other acquaintance. I just spent more time with these people, talking about why I should or shouldnt move to Portland. Mostly why I shouldnt. Our friends insisted that Dripping Springs would be no fun without Julie and me. They tried to convince us to stay. Basically, now that they have moved on and I have moved on, I dont feel the need to keep in touch with them. They say "girls come and go, but friends are forever." While there is some truth in that, friends also come and go.

Time spent with family was precious. I was sure to attend every family gathering. Every time I hung out with family, I realized how difficult it was going to be to leave them. I was moving across the country, and I was too far into it to back out now. I was scared. What if something were to happen to me? My closest relative would be over

4

two-thousand miles away. That probably scared me the most. There comes a point in your life when you have to ween yourself away from mommy and daddy. This was that point in my life.

"How will I pay for college? My money from work is gone. My parents cant

afford to pay for my college." I was going to have to find a job in Portland. Fast. I needed to make my car payment every month, as well. How difficult could it be to find a job in such a big city?

June 8th, 00 was the day Julie and I flew out of Austin. Packing up everything in my room was kinda difficult for me because I lived there for so long. It would be a long time before I saw my family, and my friends, if I ever saw them again. My friends, that is. We had to be at the airport pretty early that morning. We said our goodbyes, and that was the first time in my life that I ever saw my father cry. That was one of the hardest things I ever had to witness.

As the plane took off from Austin, I couldnt help but think about how much I was going to miss this place. "Will I get homesick and come home?" "Will I fall in love with Oregon and never return to Texas?" I had no clue what was going to happen, and was already starting to feel homesick. This was the beginning of what would be a new experience in life.

We touched down in Portland sometime in the early afternoon. Julies parents picked us up from the airport. They had left Texas a week before us. The temperature was definitely a big change from ATX. We drove through the city making our way home. I guess this was what I would call this place now, my home. Maybe I would call Portland my home away from home. When we got to the house, I got online and started

5

to fill out applications. I needed a job really bad. Anywhere that had hiring signs, I put out an application. I only had until September to get enough money for the fall term. I had given my parents two car payments in advance, so I had plenty of time

until my next payment. So I thought.

"How difficult could it be to find a job in such a big city?" I would have never guessed. The summer was almost over and I still hadnt even found a job. Not because I wasnt trying, everyone knew that. I think that it was probably because of the ratio of people to available jobs in Oregon. Apparently Oregon has the highest unemployment rate in the country. So I was just going to have to wait until next semester to start school. But Mr. And Mrs. Karpenske were not going to let that happen. They decided to lend me a helping hand and cover my first semester. I am so grateful for what the Karpenskes have done for me. Without them I probably would not have ever gone back to school.

So, as you can see, moving to Oregon is probably the biggest challenge I have faced in my life. I will frequently visit my family back home, and my friends if they are around. I really have enjoyed it here, in the few months that I have been here. I havent made any new friends. Mostly because I havent really been socializing with anyone since Ive been here. Im still looking for a job. My parents have been kind enough to cover my car payments until I find one. As far as my opinions on other states. "Yall folks aint all too bad."

Please note that this sample paper on Moving to Portland, Oregon is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Moving to Portland, Oregon, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Moving to Portland, Oregon will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide paper at affordable prices!

Despite the appearance of gradual development among Emile Durkheim's works, they might as well be considered as a single train of unified thoughts. When one contemplates his four greatest works, there lies the methodology and belief that all of our characteristics beyond that of the physiological aspect originated from, or are greatly influenced by society. This conviction is perhaps best illustrated in The Division of Labor in Society, wherein Durkheim chooses to focus on the method of interaction between people in the social order.

In essence, the division of labor is the separation of employment among workers according to the specialization that meets their needs. Durkheim's work is especially insightful because he is not merely interested in the division itself, but also in the social implications and changes that it would cause. He argues that as specialization increases, people become increasingly separated from one another. Their norms become different, interests are varied, and subcultures are formed. However, Durkheim does not believe that this specialization would lead to the collapse of the social order. His understanding is that the division of labor instead brought about a new kind of social order which is called organic solidarity. This is fundamentally a social order built on the interdependence of people in society. This concept was increasingly overshadowing that of mechanical solidarity, where members of the society are homogeneous such as the societal organization of tribes. Of course, this division is not without its problems. An industrial utopia does not form simply out of interdependence, because specialization can set people not only apart, but against each other. Interests often collide and conflicts will always exist. Durkheim himself does not believe that the changes happening around him as a result of industrialization would bring about total harmony, but he does note that though specialization sets us apart, it also binds us together in certain ways. Hence, the division of labor will always be one of the most important concepts in understanding societies and is the foundation upon which most sociological thought is built upon.

This notion is particularly evident in Durkheim's third major work entitled Suicide. Recognized as an application of his sociological method, Suicide forms a practical explanation and application of his theories, originally set out in The Rules of Sociological Method. In his aim to establish sociological autonomy, Durkheim considers society as more than just the individuals who constitute that society, believing in the ability to explain individual action in terms of society as a whole. He sees suicide as one of the most private acts an individual could perform, and were it therefore possible to explain that action in terms of society, his theory about sociological analysis would stand. Upon analyzing the text, I feel that it is not able to wholly explain the issue it addresses; yet as a practical application of the method elaborated in The Rules, it is a certified success.

I believe that when Durkheim tries to free the study of society from laymans concepts, and replace them with more scientific ones, he is aspiring to define Sociology as a science comparable to the physical sciences like biology and chemistry. Durkheim applies empirical research and analysis in the new sociological method of which it plays a large role in Suicide. Although this has been done before, perhaps the innovation then is in Durkheims application of his conception of sociological method to the statistics in order to explain suicide.

Order Custom Essay on The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide

Of equal importance to his methodology, Durkheim draws theoretical conclusions on the social causes of suicide. He proposes four types of suicide, based on the degrees of imbalance of two social forces social integration and moral regulation. Egoistic suicide results from too little social integration. Those individuals who are not sufficiently bound to social groups are left with little support or guidance, and therefore tend to commit suicide on an increased basis. An example Durkheim discovers was that of unmarried people, particularly males, who, with less to bind and connect them to stable social norms and goals, commit suicide at higher rates than unmarried people. The second type, Altruistic suicide, is a result of too much integration. It occurs at the opposite end of the integration scale as egoistic suicide. Self-sacrifice is the defining trait, where individuals are so integrated into social groups that they lose sight of their individuality and become willing to sacrifice themselves to the groups interests, even if that sacrifice are their own lives. The most common cases of altruistic suicide occur among members of the military.

On the second scale of moral regulation lie the other two forms of suicide, the first of which is Anomic suicide, located on the low end. Anomic suicide is of particular interest to Durkheim, for he divides it into four categories. Acute economic anomie refers to sporadic decreases in the ability of traditional institutions such as religion, to regulate and fulfill social needs. Chronic economic anomie is the long-term diminution of social regulation. Durkheim identifies this type with the ongoing industrial revolution, which eroded traditional social regulators and often failed to replace them. Acute domestic anomie are the sudden changes on the micro-social level which result in an inability to adapt and therefore higher suicide rates. Widowhood is a prime example of this type of anomie. Lastly, Chronic domestic anomie refers to the way marriage as an institution regulated the sexual and behavioral balance among men and women. The final type of suicide is fatalistic suicide. This type Durkheim only briefly describes, seeing it as a rare phenomena in the real world. Examples include those with over-regulated, unrewarding lives such as slaves and childless married women.

In the context of a Philippine setting, one could consider the parameters and data which were published by Durkheim in concluding that compared to other countries, relatively few Filipinos commit suicide. According to Durkheim, even natural factors such as climate tend to work socially, and in effect trigger the social factors related to suicide. An example of this would be religion. Generally, as a predominantly Catholic nation, there are more suicide cases in a country where most people are Protestants or a nation such as Japan. And yet religion is not a real factor in itself because almost every religious doctrine condemns suicide or murder. For us Filipinos then, it must be the social organization we have grown accustomed to as Roman Catholics, where there is a higher level of integration compared to Protestantism. Moreover, Durkheim considers family as another factor. Filipino culture is essentially centered on that, with emphasis on notions such as extended family, filial obligation and the sinfulness of contraceptives. Since the degree of integration of family structure is related in the same way to suicides, those in larger families are less likely to commit suicide, whereas those in smaller families, or single, are more likely. In general, applying Durkheim's theories could help us grasp a better comprehension of the realities we have to deal with day after day. This does not necessarily equate to an understanding of Filipino suicide cases, but of how our society has evolved to become such a major factor in our lives that it affects even our most seemingly personal and psychological processes.

Despite his innovative methods, I feel that Durkheim's major faults are on a number of quite crucial points. A notable factor that Durkheim discusses in the first chapter of his work is his dismissal of non-social influences on suicide. He considers these factors independently as part of an argument by elimination. He reasoning was that as suicide rates did not show a parallelism to any one factor, the explanation must lie in social facts alone. This, at best, is a tenuous assumption and one that could certainly have a detrimental effect on the validity of his application.

Furthermore, the use of statistics in the application of his method owed a great deal to the number of statisticians who had written them before him. Virtually the entire basis of Suicide rests on these statistics, yet Durkheim mentions nothing as to the validity of official data, nor their usefulness in the study of suicide. The accuracy of his data can be questioned, not only due to the inadequacies of data collection and analyses at the time of his writing, but also at the level of determination of a suicide by a coroner.

This problem is best considered alongside another of Durkheims faults which is his rejection of motive as an important factor. I believe that in times of doubt it is also important as to what the police, jurors and coroners think happened to the victim. It is therefore evident that the official statistics for suicide, and for his theories, are mostly based upon the perceptions and intuitions of fallible human beings.

However, I do not believe Durkheims sole reason for writing the text is for it to be an explanation of suicide; instead he uses it as a tool for the demonstration of his new method. The importance of this text lies in the application of a social theory to a complex phenomenon. Despite his limitationss, Durkheim was able to establish the autonomy of his discipline and that is where, I believe, the true sociological value of Suicide is revealed.Please note that this sample paper on The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Sociological Niche of Emile Durkheim's Suicide will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

To what extent do thinking and language develop separately.

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on To what extent do thinking and language develop separately.. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality To what extent do thinking and language develop separately. paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in To what extent do thinking and language develop separately., therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your To what extent do thinking and language develop separately. paper at affordable prices!

The interrelation between thinking and language can be considered in three possible ways. Firstly, language detemines thinking. Secondly, thinking determines linguistic developement. Finally, thinking and language begin independently but eventually interact to determine interllectual and social development. Before examining these propositions it would seem necessary to define the main concepts. Many everyday concepts become very complex when it comes to a concise definition and in psychology it depends who is defining them. A general and hopefully neutral definition of thinking is; any covert cognitive or conscious mental manipulation of ideas, images, symbols, words, propositions, memories,concepts, perceptions, beliefs or intentions(1). Language is the use, vocally or sub vocally, of a system of arbitrary conventional symbols by which we convey meaning.

The linguistic relativity hypothesis was put forward independently in the 10s by Whorf and by Sapir. This hypothesis claimed that language determined thought and peoples perceptions of the world. Empirical evidence such as Hopi indians lack of past and future tense verbs, or Eskimos plethora of words to describe snow was given in support of the theory.

The lack of time related verbs could be explained by the lifestyle of the Hopi, or rather advanced societies preocupation with time. Eskimos reliance on understanding snow must play a part in their language construction(how many words do we have to describe vehicles). The fact that Hopi or Eskimo can be translated into english illustrates a basic commonality, every culture knows what water, sky, air, food are. Human needs and basic desires must be the same across most cultures.

The Whorf-Sapir hypothesis is wrong to assume that language determines thought processes. Thought processes can occur when language is absent. There are five cases in history of powerful rulers instigating experiments to test this. The most well documented case was that of Akbar, Mogul Emperor of India(154-1605). Twenty to thirty infants were interred with silent caretakers for fourteen years, none of the children developed language but they had adopted a gesture system to convey their thoughts and announce their needs.(Campbell and Grieve 18). Feldman(et al.)(178), investigated six congenitally deaf children in Philadelphia, where the authorities had instructed the parents not to gesture to them formally or informally(lest this interfere with their motivation to aquire language--their theory!!). Deprived of speech and signing, they developed their own gesture communication system, they could combine gestures to make short gramatical statements at about the same age as normal children could construct two word utterances. William James(180) cites the case of a Mr Ballard, a deaf-mute instructor at Washington National College. Mr Ballard travelled the world extensivly with his father in his childhood before he recieved any communication training. He could recall in his isolation thinking about the origins of the world and mankind and many other concepts.

Custom Essays on To what extent do thinking and language develop separately.

Thought can exist without language and there are many activities which demand a high level of cognition but do not require any language at all e.g. painting, or whistling tunes. Language needs thought but this is not the end.

The possibility that thinking determined linguistic development was implicit in many of the theories of the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget one of the leading figures in developmental psychology.

Piaget provided a great insight into childrens thinking. Piagets theory gives us stages from which the child must progress with its thinking. In the sensori-motor stage, basic thoughts appear after a reflex stage. In the pre-operational stage thought based operations occur. Planned behaviour begins in the concrete operations stage, with the ability to reflect on these behaviours. Abstract thought is possible in the formal operations stage and the ability to imagine what others may think.

Piaget did not place as much stress on language aquisition as other theorists. Piaget recognised the importance of language but preferred to consider language as part of an larger concept Semiotic function, this also includes imagery, role- play, gesture, drawing, etc. He decided that as language was a part of semiotic function then it must develop later than thought but language profoundly transforms thought by allowing for more advanced conceptualization.

The lack of emphasis on language by Piaget may have contributed to the re-evaluation of his work by Margret Donaldson. In her book Childrens Minds(178) she revisits some of Piagets famous experiments. The Three Mountain experiment, to test a childs ability to decentre and conservation experiments, to examine if a child could carry out reverse thinking(remembering how something was and relating it to how it is). Donaldson redesigned these experiments or reworded the instructions or rearranged the conservation material accidentally. Donaldson et al(175) obtained much better results than Piaget. Their explanation was that they had used experiments that made human sense. They had used concepts and language related to the testees ages. This illustrates that communication must be in context. Further, Donaldson states that the adult testers with experience of language and context unknowingly confuse the child. The point of Donaldsons argument is that Piaget believed that children and adults understood words and their meanings in the same way but as illustrated by her research this clearly is not so. Older children therefore conserve not because of a cognitive shift from stage to stage, but they have developed both their thought and language in conjunction with adults, until the context and meanings are understood.

The above conclusion by Donaldson brings us to the third possibility of the interrelation of thought and language. This can be shown in the works of Lev Vygotsky, the Russian psychologist.

Though very little evidence was put forward, Vygotsky decided that language and thought developed seperately. Further, Vygotsky called language without thought social speech, a reflection of received speech, and a required reaction to others. At the same time infants were developing primitive ways of thinking and reasoning, without language.

Both Vygotsky and Piaget both agreed on the age of two years when language and thinking come together. Words begin to act as symbols and the child can begin to use words to explore its own and others thoughts. The interaction with others is the main thread of Vygotskys theory, and the development of language interacts with that of thinking. Alexander Luria was a pupil of Vygotsky and made a major contribution to the understanding of brain function. Luria demonstrated the regulative function of language in a series of experiments with childrens motor responses to coloured lights. Initially the child followed an adults instruction, eventually the child directed herself with overt speech, the language acting as a regulator of actions. At about five years of age the actions were carried out in silence, presumably the speech had become internalized and the language and thought becomes one (Luria 161). Another important theory put forward by the Vygotskian school is social cognition. Social cognition is the ability to reflect on our own and others thoughts, to put ourselves in the mental position of others. The importance of social cognition in daily communication(the resultant of thought and language) can be demonstrated by people who have a deficit in it. One of the characteristics of Autism is the deficit in conceptual role-taking(thinking yourself in anothers position) ( Baron-Cohen 18b). This deficit manifests itself in the awkward communication of autistic people. Similarly, many autistic people cannot comprehend turn-taking another crucial element in verbal communication.

Thought can exist alone but it is an impoverished system. Language embelishes the system and the more sophisticated the society the higher level of communication is needed the more expressive a language must become. Deep and expansive thought is only possible with the enabling quality of language. Whorfs evidence was from less developed societies, the members of which when inculcated in a more advanced society soon adapt to that way of thought. Piaget gave us a deep and expansive theory of child development but in placing less emphasis on language ignored an important part of the equation. Vygotskys position strikes a balance between the polerized views of Whorf and Piaget. Vygotsky and his followers e.g. Luria and Brunner have given us a theory emphasising social factors in the development of thought and language and a concept of Social Cognition which seems to be the direction of research at present.

(1) Penguin Dictionary of Psychology. A.S.Reber 185

-Feldman, Goldin-Medow and Glietman....Action, gesture and symbolthe emergence of language. 178.

-Campbell and Greive......Historiographia Linguistica...18

The Above two from..The Psychology of Language and Communication.

Ellis and Beattie...186

-James.W...... Principals of Psychology.....180

-Donaldson. M. ...Childrens Minds....175.

-Baron-Cohen. S...From O.U. Introduction to Psychology..11

Ed. I.Roth.

-Luria.A.R. .....Speech and regulation of behaviour..161

FromIntroduction to Psychology-an Integrated approach...Lloyd and Mayes..184

Please note that this sample paper on To what extent do thinking and language develop separately. is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on To what extent do thinking and language develop separately., we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on To what extent do thinking and language develop separately. will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The women of the tempest and the decameron

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on the women of the tempest and the decameron. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality the women of the tempest and the decameron paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in the women of the tempest and the decameron, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your the women of the tempest and the decameron paper at affordable prices!

Two girls- both live lives of innocence, naivet and simplicity. Both are dedicated and infatuated with their husbands who are diametrically opposite of themselves. Both, because of their unawareness of life experiences, are easily controlled and manipulated. Miranda, from Shakespeare's The Tempest, and Griselda, from Boccaccio's The Decameron, show several commonalities through their actions and behaviors in each of their distinct yet similar circumstances.

Miranda, a fifteen year old daughter of Prospero, who becomes the wife of Prince Ferdinand, is a young and innocent girl. She does not know any other life or have any other experiences with people since she has lived isolated on the enchanted island since the age of three with her father. She does not ever remember seeing the tainted society in which most people live, so therefore she has not been corrupted by it. The barren island on which Miranda and her father live is the only home/society that she has ever known. Since she knows no other life, her heart is pure and she possesses an abounding innocence. From her first lines about the shipwreck, "O, I have suffered / With those that I saw suffer! A brave vessel, / Who had, no doubt, some noble creature in her..." (I.ii.6-7), her gentle and sympathetic nature as well as her willingness to think the best about people is exemplified. When Miranda first sees Ferdinand she describes him as "A thing divine, for nothing natural / I ever saw so noble"(I..4-500) and not just "a goodly person"(I.ii.46) as Prospero had suggested.

Like Miranda, Griselda also is a youthful and naïve girl who has no real life understanding. She is a plebe that lives with her father and looks after sheep. She too knows no other home/society than that of the innocent and uninitiated. She has no familiarity with the life that Marquis Gualtieri lives, "a young bachelor without issue of his own, who devoted his time entirely to his hawking and hunting" (Boccaccio 668). But

Gualtieri had long been taken with [the] penniless young girl from a neighboring village; she was a real beauty, he thought, and with her he could expect a trouble-free life. So he looked no further but settled upon her and, sending for her father, arranged with him- a quite destitute man- to take his daughter to wife (Boccaccio 66).

Help with essay on the women of the tempest and the decameron

Gualtieri "asked her whether, if he took her for his wife, she would always strive to please him and never object to anything he did or said, and whether she would be obedient, and a whole lot of other things; to each one of which she answered yes" (Boccaccio 670). "This gentleman', said Gualtieri, 'is the woman I propose to make my wife, if she wishes me for her husband.'(Boccaccio 670) He [then] turned to her then, as she stood there blushing, her heart in her mouth, and asked 'Griselda, would you like me for your husband?' 'Yes, sir' " (Boccaccio 670) was the reply from Griselda showing her innocence for never questioning the motives and her openness to let others into her life.

The definition of dedication is setting aside for a particular purpose. Miranda carries out that definition through her actions towards others especially Ferdinand, her soon to be husband. Miranda's simplicity and innocence is what gives her elevated allure. She has obtained an amazing and refined education without the crooked pressures of civilization- the best of both worlds. Because of Miranda's wholesome heart and unsophisticated nature due to the lack of knowledge of social norms, she easily discloses her true emotions to all. She does not know how or why to be timid, and as a result is visibly straightforward with her feelings towards Ferdinand. Her assertiveness is in part what wins over his heart. In Miranda's marriage proposal to Ferdinand she declares, "I am your wife if you will marry me. / If not, I'll die your maid. To be your fellow / You may deny me, but I'll be your servant / Weather you will or no" (III.i.100-10) here demonstrating her faithfulness and honesty. She is willing to defy Prospero after he has told her not to speak to Ferdinand and enthusiastically expresses her devotion to him saying "…[she] would not wish / Any companion in the world but [him], / Nor can imagine form shape / Besides yourself to like of. But [she] prattle / Something too wildly, and [her] father's precepts / [she] therein do forget" (III.i.65-70).

"Griselda was, moreover, so obedient and attentive to her husband that he considered himself the most satisfied, most contented of men. Towards her husband's subjects too, she was so gracious and kind that she acquired the devotion of one and all and their unstinting respect" (Boccaccio 671). Griselda as well exemplifies the definition of dedication especially to her husband. Further into the story we witness the "experiment" (Boccaccio 671) that Gualtieri tests her devotion to him with. She is able to go through all the pressures and stresses the he places on his wife and she remains loving and faithful. She expresses her devotion saying, "Pray, sir, do with me whatever you think best for your honour and peace of mind; I shall be quite content, for I know I am of lower birth than they and that I'm not worthy of this honour to which, out of your kindness, you have called me" (Boccaccio 67). Because of personal interaction dynamics she learned as a result of her cloistered upbringing, she like Miranda, is unwaveringly faithful and honest which opens people's hearts to her. "It was not long before she had effectively inspired the whole world- and not merely the neighborhood under her husband's rule- to speak of her qualities and her exemplary conduct; she also confuted any who might have criticized her husband at the time he married her" (Boccaccio 671).

Because of Miranda's naivet and unawareness of life experiences beyond the shores of the enchanted island, she is easily subjected to outside manipulation and control. She seems to lead not her own life but a life that her father has planned out for her. Miranda's life is that of a marionette puppet. She is Pinocchio and Prospero is the puppet master. The relationship between Miranda and Prospero is not one that reminds the reader of a father and daughter bond but rather is reminiscent of the parallel between master and servant. This relationship is revealed as Miranda questions "…I pray you, sir- / For still 'tis beating in my mind your reason / For raising this sea storm" (I.ii.0-11). Prospero answers,

Know thus far forth / By accident most strange, bountiful Fortune, / Now my dear lady, hath mine enemies brought to this shore; and by my prescience / I find my zenith doth depend upon / A most auspicious star, whose influence / If now I court not, but omit, my fortunes / Will ever after droop. Hers cease more questions. / Thou art inclined to sleep. 'Tis a good dullness, / And give it way. I know thou canst choose (I.ii.1-1).

Prospero's speaks of his control over Miranda again when Ferdinand and Miranda first meet and he says that "[his plan] goes on, [he sees], / As [his] soul prompts it" (I.ii.501-50).

Manipulation and control are demonstrated once again in Griselda's story. The relationship resembles that of master and servant. Griselda identifies Gualtieri as "master" and "sir". Her inexperience in inclusive life experiences as she is with Gualtieri makes her susceptible to oppressive behavior. She caters to his every need and puts her self aside even when it is not in her best interest. The relationship between Miranda and Prospero in The Tempest is a mirror image of the connection in The Decameron between Griselda and Gualtieri. When Gualtieri orders for their fist born child to be killed, Griselda follows his orders promptly. "Here', she said, 'do exactly what your master and mine has commanded. But don't leave her to be devoured by the birds and beasts, unless he commands you to do so" (Boccaccio 67). She tells Gualtieri to "just think of [his] own needs, sir, and [his] own satisfaction, and don't bother [him]self at all about [her] there's only one thing that [she] case[s] about and that is [his] happiness" (Boccaccio 67).

Even though the story lines from Shakespeare's The Tempest and Boccaccio's The Decameron have nothing in common, it is simple to draw shared characteristics between Miranda and Griselda and the story surrounding their lives. We are able to see, because of the manner in which they were brought up, that Miranda and Griselda are simple, innocent and inexperienced. Because of their naivet and inexperience they are easily susceptible to control yet work though the manipulation and in spite of everything are still devoted and faithful to those that they love.

Please note that this sample paper on the women of the tempest and the decameron is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on the women of the tempest and the decameron, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on the women of the tempest and the decameron will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

High School senior Macbeth Journals

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on High School senior Macbeth Journals. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality High School senior Macbeth Journals paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in High School senior Macbeth Journals, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your High School senior Macbeth Journals paper at affordable prices!

I. I do believe people can be influenced. Sometimes others might act different or

make a choice that doesn't really reflect their character because they want to please

someone else. It's not that they were forced, but they feel pressured by another to

change their views a bit.

Order custom research paper on High School senior Macbeth Journals

In my life I have my grandmother. Because I live under her house and her

rules means I can't just go out and do whatever. My grandmother tells me how she

wants me to act or behave and it is my choice to choose the way I am. At the same

time I feel it is easier to listen to what she tells me and do it. Sometimes people are

influenced because things will be easier that way.

If I could say I have influenced anyone in life, I would say I have influenced

my siblings. I am the oldest and because of that they look at what they see me do and

might repeat what they saw. I don't understand why kids look up to their older

brother or sister, but I think it's cool. Because of my seniority they sometimes follow

in my footsteps.

It's not always cool, though. At times I feel they should make their own

decisions without looking to me for the answer. Being an influence to others can be

neat and annoying depending on how good or bad you are yourself. I don't want my

siblings to follow my every move. I only want them to do the good things I've done.

II. If Macbeth were a modern man today he would be a former Wall Street

CEO. After hearing about everything that went on at Enron and World.com, it sounds

like Macbeth would have fit right in. He would have done a good job being power

hungry money thief. It seems to fit his character.

These men didnt start out as bad as they ended up though. In the beginning

they were just trying do their job as best they could. They were successful rich. But

like Macbeth, they weren't happy with what they already had. Soon they were giving

out false information in order to gain more money even after their customers lost

money. I know stealing may not be seen as bad as murder, but those people probably

needed that money. Many people use stocks to get money for school and retirement.

Instead of murdering people, they cheated them out of a happy life. To me cheating

someone out of a good life seems like a big deal.

The very fact that these men seemed good in the beginning of their success

and later turned bad makes them similar. Although they each come from totally

different backgrounds and eras, their stories parallel each other. Powerful CEO of a

major corporation to infamous crook. Loyal noble to hated king. It's obvious their

lives share many commonalities.

III. When someone tells a guy be a man it not only challenges his birth sex, but

his ability to stand up for himself and take what is his. This expression is used to make a

man feel weak so he can then start to act more bold. Whenever someone tells another

person to be a man, they know they have pushed a button that will cause the other

person to do anything to prove they are tough.

When Macbeth tried to back out of assassinating Duncan his wife was upset.

She had already become used to the thought of her husband as king. Lady Macbeth

knew she had to do something that would change Macbeths mind about the murder and

quick.

After pleading with Macbeth for a long time to get him to kill Duncan, Lady

Macbeth finally resorted to calling him a wimp. Having been put down by his wife,

Macbeth quickly changed his mind so he could prove his masculinity to Lady Macbeth.

He then put his murderous plan back into action. He felt his wife would think of him

less if he didnt go through with the plan. In his eyes, murdering Duncan was the best

way to show his wife he loved her.

Unlike Lady Macbeth, I dont think being a man is defined by how one acts orbehaves. Being a man merely means to have a an external reproductive organ. I

dont think being a man has anything to do with anything else. A man is simply

born a man and nothing more or nothing less.

IV. Fate is a strange thing. It helps us in our path along the way. With fate, we can

be given chances we normally wouldnt have. Macbeths fate came in the form of

witches who told him about his life in the future. Fate gave him choices. Unfortunately

Macbeth didnt choose wisely.

There are times in life where we are put in a situation that has many options.

Sometimes one option might seem like it will turn out better for us than another.

Macbeth felt this way after his run in with the Weird Sisters. He knew if he dismissed

everything they told him concerning his future he would only remain the Thane of

Glamis and Cawdor. But he also knew if the king was killed, he would be given

Duncans title as the king. Macbeth saw a chance to be more than he was and gladly

took it.

So if the question was whether or not I believed in fate I would say yes. But its

not. The question is if Macbeth was fated to kill Duncan and become king. I think fate

only puts us in situations, but doesnt completely change our lives. The chance is there

and we are forced to make a good decision. Our lives belong to us and not fate. We are

the ones who choose our life.

V. I honestly dont believe Macbeth killed Banquo in order to save his future

children. There were too many instances where Macbeth was scared Banquo would

open his mouth. Macbeth was just going to murder Baquo so he wouldnt have to feel so

worried all the time. He was tired after all those times his imagination would run off

with him.

In the beginning of the book there was a trader who was a thane. Once he was

found out, he was hung. Macbeth didnt want a death like that for himself. He wanted to

rule Scotland for many years to come. Macbeth felt the only wy to keep his and his

wifes dream alive was to kill Banquo and stop him from possibly revealing Macbeths

secret.

VI. Out of every character in Macbeth, Macduff would be the strongest. He stood up

against Macbeth after Macbeth had become king. He saw a problem and

rounded people up to help him conquer Macbeth. Even though he was a bit scared, he

did what he felt was right.

Macduff let himself become a leader once Macbeth became a tyrant to his

people. Duncan had been such a great king before Macbeth had his title. Macduff knew

him and his countrymen deserved a better leader, especially in time of war. Macbeth

helped no one other than himself. He was a horrible king and even worse leader.

It takes a truly strong and brave person to stand up for what they believe in.

Macduff put his life on the line to make the lives of others better. He was loyal

to Duncan and thought his leadership was excellent. Now that Duncan was dead and

Macbeth was his successor, the country was lacking true leadership.

Macduff sought out to rectify the situation. Duncan eldest son was the heir to

his fathers kingdom. No one else was supposed to take Duncans place. Macbeth had

gone too far. It was one thing to steal an empire, but to steal an empire from

someone it was promised to was another. Macduff was the only one who had the

courage to make everything the way it should have been.

VII. Before she died, Lady Macbeth should have admitted to Macbeth she was trying

to live vicariously through him. She really wanted to rule the kingdom. It was her idea

to kill Duncan because she herself wanted the power.

Lady Macbeth wished so much to be a man, a powerful man. To her the next

best thing to being a powerful man is being the wife of one. Her speech in chapter one

made this evident.

VIII. I don't think Macbeth would have been respected when he got old. He

wouldn't be the king and everyone would be thinking about the king instead of

Macbeth. Everyone would be spending time sucking up to Duncan.

It is a good thing Macbeth wouldn't be well respected though. After seeing

how awful he turned out once he gained power, it would have made him even more

evil if people trusted his decisions. He is the type of person who would abuse his

powers every chance he could.

Macbeth clearly picks power over affection. He'd rather act ruthless and

scare people into giving him respect instead of being nice. Some choose to treat

people right and feel bad if they have to cross them in order to succeed. Macbeth

shows no feeling when harming others for personal gain. To him, power is better than

affection.

When it comes down to it people have to choose between power and

affection. It is not possible to have both. Gaining power requires one to worry about

business not others feelings. Being affectionate requires one to help others and not

yourself. Having one crosses the other out.

IX. Forgiving is hard to do. When someone crosses you or disregards your

feelings, it's hard to accept their apology. But when you finally decide to forgive

someone, it means you are allowing yourself to let your guard down with them and

believe they won't do whatever they did before.

Forgiving, however, is not the same as forgetting. You will never be able to

forget about a person harming you. The only thing you can do is have faith that they

are willing to change. If a person tells you they didn't like what they did to you and

the will act different from then on, it's hard to stay angry. At the same time, you will

always have what happened in the back of your mind.

After a person has been forgiven, they still will pay the consequences by being

trusted less. It's natural for a person to lose trust in a person after they have been

crossed. Sometimes even if you want to feel the same as you did before they messed

up, you can't. The pain will always be there no matter what.

To forgive is not to forget, but to give a second chance. The second chance

doesn't mean everything goes back to how things originally were. This is the

consequence paid by a mean, dishonest, or hurtful person. If this is their biggest

consequence, then it is the least they deserve.Please note that this sample paper on High School senior Macbeth Journals is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on High School senior Macbeth Journals, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on High School senior Macbeth Journals will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Race relations in american labor

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on race relations in american labor. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality race relations in american labor paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in race relations in american labor, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your race relations in american labor paper at affordable prices!

Ever since the beginning of American history, there have been tensions between the different races and ethnicities living in this land. When the first settlers came to America from Europe, all the different nationalities involved dealt with issues with each other and the Native Americans. Skipping ahead a couple hundred years, with the emergence of slavery, the problem with race relations, especially with blacks, reached a horrible peak. Luckily, the people of this country realized that slavery was a horrendous endeavor and it was abolished after a civil war was fought. From that point on, it seems that race relations would take a turn for the better. It has, but the truth is that many blacks in today's America make a good argument in stating that equality has not reached the level it should be. These problems with race relations have touched on every possible topic in American life. One very prevalent area where the problem with race relations has been obvious is labor. While today, it might not seem so, less than a hundred years ago, blacks were excluded from all aspects of labor including union membership, jobs, fair wages, and fair working conditions. Although all of the working class people had the basic problems of poor paying jobs and bad working conditions in common, race and ethnic problems remained prevalent and severely hampered the different races and ethnicities ability to work together to solve these problems as a group instead of as individuals working on their own. Three main contributing factors to this problem were the different wages paid to laborers, the ways in which these laborers were used, and the underlying fear of different races and ethnicities.

A problem that arises when there is a work shortage is obviously that people can't find jobs. This becomes even more of a problem when it is believed that employers are treating their employees unfairly. When thinking of unfair treatment of workers, two things usually come to mind. One is conditions and the other is pay. When looking at wage problems in America, in the early 100s, they can be directly linked to the sudden rise of unions America. Unions were thought of as a way for workers to be able to stand up against employers paying unfair wages. The problem that arose however was the fact that as a basic rule, minorities and especially blacks were paid lower wages than their white counterparts. That is of course when they were even allowed jobs. This imbalance in pay combined with the work shortages of the time produced a problem for unions, who would use strikes as their main weapons against companies. When workers would strike, companies could simply fire the workers and hire "scabs", who would work for less money then what was originally being paid to the union workers. As it turns out, the "scabs" were often times minorities and in many cases black. This in itself helped divide races from joining together to fight for their rights. Whites were often very resentful towards the blacks for taking their jobs, but the blacks and minorities were happy to simply find work. "We didn't understand why they (blacks) went to work when we were out, and I guess they couldn't trust the white people… We lost the union because of that and I didn't think we was ever going to have one again, not with so many coloreds in there." (Halpern, p.74-75) This statement was a white workers response to the Amalgamated Meat Cutters strike that was broken by the company's hiring of black workers to replace the white ones on strike.

Companies realized that hiring "scabs" was an effective way to break union strikes. After a strike was broken, employers often times would not hire the old employees back. When they did, they would often times be very vengeful in their treatment of the workers and in many cases cut wages of the strikers. This would often bring down more heat upon black laborers. Black workers inadvertently gave employers insurance against strikes and therefore weakened a union's effectiveness. In many cases, it was not only wage-problems that arose.

"Black workers were severely hobbled by racism. Employers fomented racial hatred by using blacks as strikebreakers, and the racism of white workers sometimes came back to haunt them. In 1886, for instance, white steelworkers at Steelton, Pennsylvania, founded a Jim Crow benevolent society, then turned around five years later and solicited black support in a strike, but were told by blacks, "we were not wanted at first and will not join under any circumstances."" (Laurie, p.1) Racism in America was already a very common thing, but with employers pitting white workers against blacks, matters only worsened as America went into the great depression. Even though racism was still prevalent in the twenties and thirties, voices of reason did ring out as early as the 180s. W.E.B. Du Bois, an African American sociologist and historian believed that, "Native-born and northern-European-derived workers enjoyed the "wages of whiteness"." (Zieger and Gall, p. 16) "Du Bois and other champions of racial and ethnic minorities concluded that the struggle of blacks for access to America's opportunities had to be conducted as much against a tenacious white working class as against employers." (Zieger and Gall, p.16) Unfortunately, racism was too far ingrained in American society for Du Bois' belief to gain wide-enough acceptance. Even when the point was reached that blacks were being accepted into unions, the division remained due to the lasting racial tensions. An example of this was Philip Weightman. He was a black hog butcher heavily involved in a union, who became a "scab" because of treatment by whites. "Yet during the 11- strike, Weightman crossed the Amalgamated's picket line and remained on the job, his initial enthusiasm for the organization destroyed by the Jim Crow treatment he received at the hands of white members." (Halpern, p.74) This is not to say that all blacks felt this way. Towards the 10s, blacks were beginning to break through the racial barrier, but the work was far from over. It seems that whites did however begin to realize that combining with blacks would help the overall labor movement. It seemed that people were finally starting to head the warnings of union man Samuel Gompers, "If we fail to organize and recognize the colored wage-workers we cannot blame them if they… frustrate our purposes… if common humanity will not prompt us to have their cooperation, an enlightened self-interest should." (Zieger and Gall, p.16) Racism from whites was still very common, and in the cases that whites were willing to organize with blacks to fight employers, that is often where the relationship ended. Many whites still felt that blacks were inferior and did not belong with whites.

Custom writing service can write essays on race relations in american labor

It seems that jobs and money were not the only reasons that racism was so common during the time. It is no doubt that a reason for this hatred of blacks, especially in the South, came from the opinion that blacks were inferior because they were recently slaves. How can a race that has been dominated for so long by another all of a sudden be seen as equal? Blacks were often times looked at as uncivilized savages. This played a major role in keeping blacks and whites from uniting in the labor movement. In many cases, white men and women were afraid to be around blacks. This was especially the case concerning women and children. Whites did not want blacks near their women and children. It is true that in the mining industry, during the 180s, blacks and whites began to unionize together, but that was as far as some whites wanted it. This undoubtedly set the stage for inequalities that would be faced by blacks in not only the working world, but also in the social world. ""Nowhere were the ethics of living Jim Crow more subtle and treacherous," Jacquelyn Dowd Hall observes, "than when they touched on the proper conduct of black men towards white women…." Indeed, the singular power of the social equality charge flowed from its formidable capacity to link African American empowerment and interracial activity in wide-ranging endeavors-schooling, worship, casual recreation, political campaigns, social movements-to the lurid imagery of interracial sex." (Letwin, p.544) These whites were only concerned with the illusion of equality for blacks and only as long as whites would benefit from it.

Unfortunately, racism has been a staple in American history. Things have certainly changed a great deal for the better, and true equality in all aspects is certainly a possibility and in reach, but common class interests among workers did not prevail of racial and ethnic differences until at least the 150s-60s. In the thirties, there was still too much of a racial and ethnic barrier in place for workers to truly unite together. Three main contributing factors to this problem were the different wages paid to laborers, the ways in which these laborers were used, and the underlying fear of different races and ethnicities in the 10s. Although tremendous strides were made during this period, it would be over the next thirty years that fundamental changes would take place.

Halpern, Rick. Down on the Killing Floor. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago. 17

Laurie, Bruce. Artisans into Workers. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago. 18

Letwin, Daniel. Interracial Unionism, Gender, and "Social Equality" in the Alabama Coalfields, 1878-108. The Journal of Southern History, Volume LXI, No. , August 15

Zieger, Robert H. and Gall, Gilbert J. American Workers, American Unions. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 186

Please note that this sample paper on race relations in american labor is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on race relations in american labor, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on race relations in american labor will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

"How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?"

If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on "How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?". What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality "How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?" paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in "How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?", therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your "How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?" paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!

"How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to the

Civil Rights Movement in the 150s and 160s?"

Martin Luther King Jnr is well know through the world for his dedication to the advancement of coloured peoples civil rights along with his undying faith in god, justice and equality. His contribution was one of the greatest in the periods the 150s and 160s. His strong leadership, passive nature will be remembered for years to come and his name will stand along side those like Gangi as some of the greatest fighters for justice. Mr King Jr fought for freedom and equality for the African American population of the US.

Martin Luther King Jr's great oratory skills helped him greatly in the period of the 50-60's, he shouting words of hope for a greater America, world and future for the world, "I have a dream it is the American dream" his ability to capture an audience, and some of his speeches will for ever be quoted. His leadership was a crucial part of his contribution to Civil Rights movements in the southern states and all over America. Martin Luther King Jr's played a key stone role in organising on mass events; protests, demonstrations and boycotts. He was a strong leader by nature and environment, remaing that way throughout his remarkable life which sadly was cut short . King was a master of words even in his weekly church service he preached about many rights, which all of God's people should have. By doing this he influenced a great number of people. Martin Luther King Jr's contributed everything to the development of the Civil Rights Movements through his enduring commitment to the battle, belief in justice, the truth, he won the hearts of many as he made not only the people of America but the wider world by making people aware, by giving education back to the masses.

Buy cheap "How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?" term paper

Becoming involved in 155, he was a large player, becoming elected as president of the Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA). Participating by leading the Bus Boycott, a very successful plan, which ended with a win, stopping segregation in Montgomery buses. This boycott is remember as the starting point of a political turn-around for the southern states of America becoming one of the most important contribution in the struggle for black rights, such as Alabama. Moving to Atlanta in 157 he began to strive for equality yet again, this time being elected as the leader of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). His involvement became so contriversal for the time it lead to his arrest during a sit-in demonstration at the Rich's department store. He was sentenced to four months hard labour. This event is just one of the many that demonstrated his commitment to the Civil Rights Movements as he was arrest many times after that.

Liberty, freedom, equality, jobs and everything in the American constitution that was not available for black Americans in the 150s was what King fought for and even lost his life over. One of his main attitudes was that all campaigns and demonstrations should be conducted non-violently. Violence was not the answer in King's book, fighting wasn't going to change white population's views on the negro's, this view faced ridicule all the time through his life by his opposition for actually promoting violence(black panthers) His critics accused him of hypocrisy by saying "He marches for peace on one day, and the next day he threatens actions we think are coldly calculated to bring violent responses from otherwise peaceful neighbourhoods." Yet he still stood strong and his popularity grew, no matter how hard they pushed he would never hit back.

16 King put his life on the line along with many others by holding a protest-march, this was during a time where local white authorities were openly and publicly opposing the integration of the black community (desegregation of their society) Even though some activities King conducted for civil rights in America had violence happen at them they were never approved by Mr King and many where stage with no violence at all, but what was more important was how they received huge attention and support by the community and media, world wide. The population could not stand to see armed policemen with dogs and fire hoses against defenceless protesters, the public always cheers for the underdog. In response to the Birmingham protests, President Kennedy submitted civil rights legislation to Congress, which led to the authorisation of the Civil Rights Act of 164. All this because of Martin Luther King Jr and his strong believes; it was his idea to march in Birmingham, as he believed that he could make a change in the lives of the black American's who lived there. King was committed to the cause of non-violence, although his opinion of the topic may have changed slightly throughout his career, but he remained generally consistent to his cause.

But it was on 8 of August 16 when the battel was taken to Washingtons door step, on the issue of jobs and freedom over 50,000 protesters marched together to Washington, D.C. At the end of the march, on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, King delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech one that most people remember most clearly. He motivated people, spoke for the people, expressed their views and at the same time made the nation aware of the injustices Black American's were facing in the south. This is the peek of his career

King attracted so much international media attention that his work even crossed the desk of the Noble Peace Prize committee and he was awarded this great honour of being a recipient at a ceremony in Oslo, Norway in 164. Although Mr King was not the only leader nor campaigner of Black Civil rights movements throughout this period of America history, he was one of the greatest leaders and a vital member of a team of activists who all contributed to the advancement of civil rights in America. King is still recognised today by Americans and people across the globe, and he is celebrated in the USA every year on the 15 January each year "National King Holiday" This is a day of celebration of the achievements King, his supporters and leaders alike.

Civil Rights Movements were formed by Black Americans because of the segregation in the southern states of America. Someone needed to take a stand, to lead the people King was that person. He recognised in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech "The problem is far from solved. We still have a long, long way to go before the dream of freedom is a reality for the Negro in the United States." The dreams, ideas that MLK stood for and his leadership turned the futures around for black Americans. It is unsure whether or not civil right's for the African American people would be the same now had it not been for king's large and powerful contribution. King devoted himself to the cause. But King also acknowledged that what he had achieved was done with the help of many others including God. His vision of a unite people, not matter how what, now matter if they were from different races, religions and social backgrounds, he saw it as people working and living together in a spirit of harmony and cooperation. Martin Luther King Jr underwent public humiliation, beatings, death threats imprisonment and finally assassination all because of the ideals and principles he believed in till the day he died. He was much more then a spiritual leader he was a moral one, one who had a major impact on te history of civil rights in America and globally. Ultimately King was sustained by a belief in righteousness in all people. In his own words

"I am convinced that the universe is under the control of a loving purpose, and that in the struggle for righteousness man has cosmic companionship. Behind the harsh appearance of the world there is a benign power."

"We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal"

Bibliography

Websites

http//www.stanford.edu/group/King/about_king/major_kingFrame.htm (Timeline, freedom struggle and events)

http//www.guardian.co.uk/netnotes/article/0,67,67107,00.html (Events and opinions)

http//www.heroism.org/class/160/CivilUnrest.htm (Speeches)

http//www.worldbook.com/features/features (Bus Boycotts)

Handouts

King or Knave (quotes)

Abolish the King Holiday

The speeches of Martin Luther King Jr

American Civil right's Movement

Black man walk (RE hand out)

Please note that this sample paper on "How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?" is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on "How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?", we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom research papers on "How important was Martin Luther King Jr's Contribution to theCivil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s?" will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!