Monday, February 24, 2020

Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas paper at affordable prices!


In Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an


American Slave, Douglass presents the reader with a


world in which Christianity and slavery walk hand in


hand; A Christian community in which the word master


Help with essay on Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas


signifies the sole proprietary owner of another's


existence. A world in which it is deemed unchristian


for an oppressed man or woman to speak out on their


own behalf. A society in which God's gift of free will


is only enjoyed by the wealthy land owner who's


transgressions against his fellow man will not be


judged in the eyes of the Lord; in a land esteemed as


being the promise land of the hard working man.


Through this world, Douglass illustrates the hypocrisy


of the self proclaimed righteous Christian master and


opens the eyes of the reader to the true cost of


southern prosperity.


In his opening lines, Douglass addresses how the


institution of slavery narrows slaves opportunities


for self-knowledge. Slave owners withhold information


about slaves birth dates in order to keep them from


developing a unique sense of self. For what better way


to affirm ones authority than to deny another his


identity? How can slaves differentiate themselves as


being men when they "know how old they are no more


than horses do." Furthermore slaves were forbidden to


learn to read to gain what Douglass termed the "key to


freedom". This denying another of literacy is in fact


another hypocritical act on the part of the owners. It


was expected of the slaves to be Christian; but how


can one be a follower of the book, when one cannot


read the book. Those who could read the word, would


often manipulate it to their advantage and often cite


it while administering a beating or raping this


victims.


Likewise, Douglass explains how their masters do not


acknowledge family ties among slaves. Family


relationships would allow slaves to develop a unique


sense of self and would encourage alliances among


slaves, a serious threat to the slave owners hold on


power. Douglass also states that he believes his


father was his first master, Captain Anthony. Denying


slaves information about their parentage allows slave


owners to avoid taking parental responsibility for


their unchristian sexual exploitation of female


slaves. Masters often sold these children,


embarrassing evidence of adultery and fornication, two


sins harshly condemned by the Christian religion of


these supposedly pious slave owners. For those who


weren't sold, the masters made sure of their misery


through severe beatings, only adding to the evil. An


example of this is the horrific scene in which Andrew


crushes the head of Douglass' younger brother.


Although Douglass does not say so, it is possible that


Captain Anthony was also his brother's father. All of


this is done for no reason symbolizing the senseless


violence towards children of slavery. If children


weren't enough for the reader, Douglass also goes to


illustrate the sad death of his grandmother as she is


left alone in a shack in the depths of the forest even


after raising her master from infancy to the grave she


is left to die like an animal. The slaveholder's


attacks at family structure do not end there. Further


into the narrative, Douglass describes how he is sent


by the "reformed" Thomas Auld to Covey. Douglass uses


this to attack the hypocrisy of religious slave owners


in that both men are highly religious yet they are


unforgivably cruel. Covey, who is deeply religious,


had a married man impregnate his female slave. Besides


the obvious sin of treating another human being like a


piece of livestock, there is a greater sin of forcing


a man to violate his marriage vows.


Douglass includes a great example of how slavery is


the antithesis of Christianity as he portrays Sophia


Auld's transformation upon becoming a slave owner.


Sofia was a kind, affectionate woman and, at first,


treated Douglass like a human being, discouraging his


servility and educating him. When her husband informed


her that education would ruin Douglass as a slave, she


began to treat him like property. Consequently, she


loses her former kindness and generosity and is


reduced to being just another cruel owner. Through


this Douglass maintains that slavery corrupts the


slave owner's humanity just as it corrupts the


slave's.


For a society so preoccupied with Christian morals


and beliefs, one must ask how slave owners and their


sympathizers could allow such barbarity. Douglass


explains this by showing how slave owners must


constantly deny the humanity of their slaves in order


to justify their misdeeds. By "dealing with the


brutes" the owner himself is reduced to being the


brute, and as a result turns to becoming piously


religious in order to convince himself otherwise.


Because slaves were classified as inferior and not


quite human, the legal system judged them as less


credible than their masters. In the courts the


testimony of a black witness was never equal to that


of a white witness. The slave's law began and ended


with his oppressor. No beating was unfair or too


severe unless the master said so. No sexual activity


was rape unless the master said so. No killing was


murder unless the master said so. In the unlikely


event the ruling be in favor of the victim the crime


would be considered against property, not an equal


person. Such everyday affirmation of ones position in


society only goes to justify the means. Some slaves


were so brainwashed that they fight other masters


slaves over whose master is better. These absurdities


are a direct result of the slave owners control over


the slaves self-knowledge. Douglass narrative


testifies that no master is a good master, even if


some are less brutal than others. All of these are


attempts at separating the blacks while the white


oppressors, on the other hand, keep up a united front.


None of Douglass' white co-workers would testify on


his behalf after the white apprentices nearly beat him


to death. Even after such affirmations, sooner or


later the slaves would demand their freedom. For this


the masters use their evil to devise a genius idea in


which they grant slaves days off during religious


holidays only to drink and engage in nonchristian


disillusioning acts which in turn disgust the slaves


with the notion of freedom ultimately making them feel


better to return to work. It is this ungodly


manipulation and deception that the slave owners pride


themselves.


Chapter after chapter, Frederick Douglass' narrative


is a powerful testament to the barbarity and hypocrisy


of the supposedly Christian institution of slavery.


This narrative is beam of light in a dark time in


American history where two apparently contradictory


beliefs merge together to benefit the immoral profit


hungry band of thieves known as the upper class;


Twisted individuals who filter the word of God and


manipulate it in order to further their profits. For


there can be no justice when a society can use


Christianity to promote evil.


Please note that this sample paper on Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Hypocrisy of Southern Christianity in the Narative of Frederick Douglas will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!