Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Evol vs creat

If you order your cheap term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on evol vs creat. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality evol vs creat paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in evol vs creat, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your evol vs creat paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!


In my short life on this planet I have come to question things


that many take upon blind faith. We all know that we must some day


die; yet we continuously deny the forces at work inside ourselves,


which want to search out the answers of what may or may not come


Help with essay on evol vs creat


after. It is far easier for humanity to accept that they will go to a


safe haven and be rewarded for their lives with pleasures and


fantasies of an unfathomable scale than to question the existence of a


supposed omnipotent being. Yet, there are a few of us humans who tend


to question the whys and wherefores that society puts forth to us.


We question the existence of God, or the creation of mankind rather


than blindly accepting faith-filled beliefs we may received from our


parents as children. Perhaps it is because we live in a nation filled


with many peoples of different beliefs whose Gods are all so varied


and different that it is difficult to fathom that they are all the


same divine being. It is also plausible that we just have a desire to


quench the thirst for knowledge that lies deep within ourselves. As


for myself, I cannot believe in a being which created a universe and a


multitude of worlds in a rather short period of time then deigns to


lower itself into becoming a puppet-master and pulling the strings


of the Earth and all of the people therein.


Since this paper touches upon many scientific terms, I feel


that in order for the reader to correctly grasp the content I must


first define three words Theory, Law, and Hypothesis. The definitions


will allow for a greater understanding of this essay and give us an


even ground upon which to begin.


---


Theory; noun


1. a. Systematically organized knowledge applicable in a relatively


wide variety of circumstances, especially a system of assumptions,


accepted principles, and rules of procedure devised to analyze,


predict, or otherwise explain the nature or behavior of a specified


set of phenomena. b. Such knowledge or such a system.


. An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a


conjecture.


Law; noun


1. a. A formulation describing a relationship observed to be


invariable between or among phenomena for all cases in which the


specified conditions are met the law of gravity. b. A generalization


based on consistent experience or results the law of supply and


demand; the law of averages.


Hypothesis; noun


1. A tentative explanation that accounts for a set of facts and can be


tested by further investigation; a theory.


. Something taken to be true for the purpose of argument or


investigation; an assumption.


---


It is important that you thoroughly read the above definitions


or you will be at a disadvantage if you do not. You will note that


there are several different definitions to each word. I felt it was


important to include the added definitive statement to theory because


it shows the difference between a scientific theory and an everyday


theory based upon conjecture. The additional definitions to law and


hypothesis are both added for a further understanding of these words.


The definition of creationism is somewhat more complex. One


must start by saying that the belief in the creation of the universe


given at the beginning of the Bible is literally true. Creationism is


a belief based solely upon faith (which is a belief in and of itself).


There are no scientific facts as a basis for this belief, solely


conjectural theories and speculations. It is ingrained into our minds,


as children that a belief of a force, or supernatural entity, which is


all powerful and all knowing, is watching over us and taking care of


our needs. Yet, to me, saying this very sort of thing is heretical in


its very essence. To be so crude as to think that some being which


created the universe itself and all things in it would take the time


to care for each and every individual is incomprehensible. In


practically all ancient cultures, the biblical included, the universe


was thought of as an original chaos into which order had been


introduced by a creative hand This was the essence of creation.1 In


this statement alone we can see one of the major flaws of creationism.


While science can prove without doubt the universe up to the first 0


milliseconds of existence, we cannot prove anything before that point


at this time. The statement above, regarding creationism, suggests


that there was no beginning, only chaos. Subsequently this creative


hand structured the order of the universe out of chaos and applied


physical laws to that chaos so it would form itself into motion and


order. Yet, creationism as a whole does not touch base upon what came


before the chaos. While science admits that there was a time in which


different laws and order applied; creationism attempts to deny this


existence by saying that there was always something. For if there was


indeed a beginning and there was no God before this time, where did


God come from? We can scientifically prove that there was a beginning.


We cannot yet ascertain what was before this beginning, but we now


know that there was one. To suggest that the universe has always


existed is a mere myth today. Much like the myth that the world was


once flat. Today, we take for granted that the world is indeed round,


for have we not seen pictures from the space shuttle in orbit of the


earth. Not to mention the multitude of orbital shots from satellites.


Consequently we would consider it preposterous if someone attempted to


tell us that the world is a flat surface. Yet, upon blind faith, some


are content to believe that a creative hand structured this


existence. Although the figures (Gods) differ from mythos to mythos,


all the ancient stories intend simply to give a poetic accounting for


cosmic origins.


In the scientific community there is a well known and accepted


theory known as the Big Bang Theory. Most people know of this theory


because they were taught it in school. Yet it usually contradicted


what their parents and pastors taught them in church. As a result, the


Big Bang Theory was generally discarded as something that intellectual


minds which cannot exist upon the true faith alone, must accept as


truth. The Big Bang Theory is stated in condensed form as follows. As


the universe expanded, the residual radiation from the big bang would


continue to cool, until now it should be a temperature of about K


(about -70ø C/-454ø F). This relic radiation was detected by radio


astronomy in 165, thereby providing what most astronomers consider to


be confirmation of the big bang theory. In this statement we have our


first of arguments over creationism by evolution. We have the


beginnings of a proof that there was a time or rather, I should say, a


point in time where there was indeed nothing.


Many creationists will argue that the universe is too ordered;


the path of the planets (which meant wanderers, or great wanderers in


early Grecian society) is too ordered, too perfect. I will start by


asking you to attempt to define perfect (as it existed at that time).


In the creationalistic point of view, a person might write it off as


the act of God. It was his divine will that moved the planets together


in such a way as to be able to support life. Or you could ask the more


worldly scientist who would explain to you about the Law of


Probability, the Theory of Relativity, and show you lengthy


mathematical equations dealing with Quantum and Theoretical Physics.


In the end, you would likely have a headache of immense size, but come


away with perhaps a better understanding of how the order of events,


and the laws which created, ordered and structured the planets to


exist as they do. Many creationism fanatics will also attempt to


dissuade the argument of evolution by saying that the Big Bang is


merely a theory. The only reply that the scientific world can refute


this with is the fact that relativity and gravity, are also theories.


This argument by creationists is obviously not in their favor.


The creation of the universe by scientific means is a


world-wide theory that many creationists refute simply because it goes


against their beliefs. Yet to understand evolution to its fullest, we


must further investigate life, or rather human life. We ask questions


like How did we evolve from amoebae? Are you trying to tell me that I


evolved from an ape? If we are evolving in such a manner as described,


why can we not see it daily? Since these are all very good questions,


I will touch base upon them all.


Approximately seven-hundred or eight-hundred million years ago


life was first known on this planet in the form of single-celled


organisms called procaryotes, not amoebae. Over time these unicellular


organisms diversified into an array of adaptive types. Scientists


hypothesize that many advanced cells (eucaryotes) may have evolved


through amalgamation of a number of distinct simple cell types.


Single-celled eucaryotes then developed complex modes of living and


advanced types of reproduction that led to the appearance of


multicellular plants and animals. The latter are first known from


about seven-hundred million years ago, and their appearance implies


that at least moderate levels of free atmospheric oxygen and a


relatively predictable supply of food plants had been achieved.4


Through a long and drawn out process life eventually formed into that


of mammals and dinosaurs. However, approximately sixty-five million


years ago the dinosaur specie was completely eradicated (perhaps by


way of natural selection), which left only mammals.


Approximately two million years ago humanity began to show its


evolution in the order of the universe. Humans originally belonged to


an order of mammals, the primates, which existed before the dinosaurs


became extinct. This development of descending from tree habitats to


forest floors and eventually to more open country was associated with


the development of many unique features of the human primate, such as


erect posture and reduced canine teeth, which suggests new habits of


feeding. However, while humanity did evolve from a primate ancestor,


it did not evolve directly from an ape-like specie. Humans as well as


apes both evolved from the same primate specie, but each branched in


different directions to become apes in one specie and humans in


another specie.


Yet, you ask that if this is the case, and humanity has


evolved from primates in such a short period of time, why can we not


see the evolutionary process taking place today? The answer is a


simple one. I know of no human which has lived for two-million years.


Which in and of itself is not a very valid argument for this case, but


nevertheless a substantial point at any rate. However, if we were to


be more objective about the process of human evolution we would see


that in the life span of the earth we are still a relatively young


race. Dinosaurs, for example, inhabited this planet for over


one-hundred-thirty-five million years. In relative view of this


information, we can see that humans have only been in existence for


approximately 1/60th of the time that dinosaurs existed. With this in


mind, we can further grasp that the process of evolution is a very


slow process which requires an almost incomprehensible scale of time


to our limited lifespans.


While I realize that many points, and beliefs were not touched


upon in this essay I did attempt to cover as much ground as possible


in as short a space as possible. It is painfully clear to me that an


existence based upon blind faith is no longer an acceptable tradition.


The ideas of creationism are far outweighed by the Laws and Theories


of evolution. While there are understandably a great many men who have


spent a vast amount of time in scribing the Bible, we must realize


that they were indeed men, not Gods and the bible is, actually, only a


book. To believe the contents of that book completely, one must have


unwavering faith in the validity of its concepts and the precepts upon


which its religion is based. One of the striking and perhaps most


intriguing points of interest that I have stumbled upon is the lack of


education of creationism in schools. If the point was so very valid


and without skeptical doubt, then why is it not being taught to our


children? I understand the idea of separation between church and


state, and the fact that the school is very much a part of state. Yet


it seems to me that if the idea is a basic building block in todays


society then why not teach this to the young? Why is it that we only


teach evolution if it is so unbelievable? The simple fact of the


matter is that we have evidence and supporting cases in science today


which makes the very idea of creationism redundant to teach, as well


as a contradicting view of evolution which could possibly confuse


those of a younger age. There are many religions in the world upon


which the bible are based, and the ones which espouse creationism are


but a few. Being a western culture we tend to forget this.


In summary I believe that evolution is the only plausible of


these two theories which is acceptable to the current state of


humanity. In closing I leave you with a simple, yet disturbing


statement that a great man once told me it is not what you believe;


its what you can prove. Creationism is based upon belief; evolution


is based upon scientific proof.


Please note that this sample paper on evol vs creat is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on evol vs creat, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college papers on evol vs creat will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!